Advertisement
Research Article|Articles in Press

Association of the breast reconstruction modality with the development of postmastectomy lymphedema: A long-term follow-up study

Published:January 31, 2023DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejso.2023.01.027

      Abstract

      Background

      Whether the breast reconstruction modality could influence the long-term development of post-mastectomy lymphedema has been little investigated. The present study aimed to evaluate the potential association of the breast reconstruction method with the incidence of lymphedema over an extended follow-up period.

      Methods

      Patients with breast cancer who underwent immediate reconstruction from 2008 to 2014 were reviewed. They were categorized into three groups according to the reconstruction method: tissue expander/implant, abdominal flaps, and latissimus dorsi (LD) muscle flaps. Differences in the cumulative incidence of lymphedema by the reconstruction method were analyzed, as well as their independent influence on the outcome. Further analyses were conducted with propensity-score matching for baseline characteristics.

      Results

      In total, 664 cases were analyzed with a median follow-up of 83 months (402 prostheses, 180 abdominal flaps, and 82 LD flaps). The rate of axillary lymph node dissection was significantly higher in the LD flap group than in the other two groups. The 5-year cumulative incidences of lymphedema in the LD flap, abdominal flap, and prosthesis groups were 3.7%, 10.6%, and 10.9%, respectively. In multivariable analyses, compared to the use of the LD flap, that of tissue expander/implant and that of abdominal flaps were associated with increased risks of lymphedema. A similar association was observed in the propensity-score matching analysis. The use of abdominal flaps or prostheses was not associated with the outcomes.

      Conclusions

      Our results suggest that the method of immediate breast reconstruction might be associated with the development of postmastectomy lymphedema.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to European Journal of Surgical Oncology
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Ahmed R.L.
        • Prizment A.
        • Lazovich D.
        • Schmitz K.H.
        • Folsom A.R.
        Lymphedema and quality of life in breast cancer survivors: the Iowa Women's Health Study.
        J Clin Oncol. 2008; 26: 5689-5696https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2008.16.4731
        • Park K.E.
        • Allam O.
        • Chandler L.
        • Mozzafari M.A.
        • Ly C.
        • Lu X.
        • et al.
        Surgical management of lymphedema: a review of current literature.
        Gland Surg. 2020; 9: 503-511https://doi.org/10.21037/gs.2020.03.14
        • Schaverien M.V.
        • Coroneos C.J.
        Surgical treatment of lymphedema.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2019; 144: 738-758https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000005993
        • Avraham T.
        • Daluvoy S.V.
        • Riedel E.R.
        • Cordeiro P.G.
        • Van Zee K.J.
        • Mehrara B.J.
        Tissue expander breast reconstruction is not associated with an increased risk of lymphedema.
        Ann Surg Oncol. 2010; 17: 2926-2932https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-010-1112-2
        • Card A.
        • Crosby M.A.
        • Liu J.
        • Lindstrom W.A.
        • Lucci A.
        • Chang D.W.
        Reduced incidence of breast cancer-related lymphedema following mastectomy and breast reconstruction versus mastectomy alone.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012; 130: 1169-1178https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e31826d0faa
        • Crosby M.A.
        • Card A.
        • Liu J.
        • Lindstrom W.A.
        • Chang D.W.
        Immediate breast reconstruction and lymphedema incidence.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012; 129 (789e-95e)https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e31824a2ab1
        • Lee K.T.
        • Mun G.H.
        • Lim S.Y.
        • Pyon J.K.
        • Oh K.S.
        • Bang S.I.
        The impact of immediate breast reconstruction on post-mastectomy lymphedema in patients undergoing modified radical mastectomy.
        Breast. 2013; 22: 53-57https://doi.org/10.1016/j.breast.2012.04.009
        • Miller C.L.
        • Colwell A.S.
        • Horick N.
        • Skolny M.N.
        • Jammallo L.S.
        • O'Toole J.A.
        • et al.
        Immediate implant reconstruction is associated with a reduced risk of lymphedema compared to mastectomy alone: a prospective cohort study.
        Ann Surg. 2016; 263: 399-405https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000001128
        • Alderman A.K.
        • Wilkins E.G.
        • Kim H.M.
        • Lowery J.C.
        Complications in postmastectomy breast reconstruction: two-year results of the Michigan Breast Reconstruction Outcome Study.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2002; 109: 2265-2274https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-200206000-00015
        • McCarthy C.M.
        • Mehrara B.J.
        • Long T.
        • Garcia P.
        • Kropf N.
        • Klassen A.F.
        • et al.
        Chest and upper body morbidity following immediate postmastectomy breast reconstruction.
        Ann Surg Oncol. 2014; 21: 107-112https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-013-3231-z
        • Lee K.T.
        • Bang S.I.
        • Pyon J.K.
        • Hwang J.H.
        • Mun G.H.
        Method of breast reconstruction and the development of lymphoedema.
        Br J Surg. 2017; 104: 230-237https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.10397
        • Siotos C.
        • Sebai M.E.
        • Wan E.L.
        • Bello R.J.
        • Habibi M.
        • Cooney D.S.
        • et al.
        Breast reconstruction and risk of arm lymphedema development: a meta-analysis.
        J Plast Reconstr Aesthetic Surg. 2018; 71: 807-818https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2018.01.012
        • Chang D.W.
        • Kim S.
        Breast reconstruction and lymphedema.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010; 125: 19-23https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181c49477
        • Slavin S.A.
        • Van den Abbeele A.D.
        • Losken A.
        • Swartz M.A.
        • Jain R.K.
        Return of lymphatic function after flap transfer for acute lymphedema.
        Ann Surg. 1999; 229: 421-427https://doi.org/10.1097/00000658-199903000-00017
        • Classen D.A.
        • Irvine L.
        Free muscle flap transfer as a lymphatic bridge for upper extremity lymphedema.
        J Reconstr Microsurg. 2005; 21: 93-99https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2005-864841
        • Slavin S.A.
        • Upton J.
        • Kaplan W.D.
        • Van den Abbeele A.D.
        An investigation of lymphatic function following free-tissue transfer.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 1997; 99 (; discussion 42-3): 730-741https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-199703000-00020
        • Khazanchi R.K.
        • Rakshit K.
        • Bal C.S.
        • Guleria S.
        • Sinha S.
        • Srivastava A.
        Evaluation of lymphatic drainage in free flaps by lymphoscintigraphy: a preliminary study.
        Br J Plast Surg. 1996; 49: 123-128https://doi.org/10.1016/s0007-1226(96)90087-9
        • Abbas Khan M.A.
        • Mohan A.
        • Hardwicke J.
        • Srinivasan K.
        • Billingham R.
        • Taylor C.
        • et al.
        Objective improvement in upper limb lymphoedema following ipsilateral latissimus dorsi pedicled flap breast reconstruction--a case series and review of literature.
        J Plast Reconstr Aesthetic Surg. 2011; 64: 680-684https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2010.06.014
        • Lee K.T.
        • Lim S.Y.
        • Pyun J.K.
        • Mun G.H.
        • Oh K.S.
        • Bang S.I.
        Improvement of upper extremity lymphedema after delayed breast reconstruction with an extended latissimus dorsi myocutaneous flap.
        Arch Plast Surg. 2012; 39: 154-157https://doi.org/10.5999/aps.2012.39.2.154
        • Barreiro G.C.
        • Baptista R.R.
        • Kasai K.E.
        • dos Anjos D.M.
        • Busnardo Fde F.
        • Modolin M.
        • et al.
        Lymph fasciocutaneous lateral thoracic artery flap: anatomical study and clinical use.
        J Reconstr Microsurg. 2014; 30: 389-396https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0034-1372482
        • Tinhofer I.E.
        • Meng S.
        • Steinbacher J.
        • Roka-Palkovits J.
        • Gyori E.
        • Reissig L.F.
        • et al.
        The surgical anatomy of the vascularized lateral thoracic artery lymph node flap-A cadaver study.
        J Surg Oncol. 2017; 116: 1062-1068https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.24783
        • Kim J.
        • Lee H.
        • Pyon J.K.
        • Mun G.H.
        • Bang S.I.
        • Jeon B.J.
        • et al.
        Association of unilateral latissimus dorsi muscle harvest for breast reconstruction with postoperative spinal posture.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2022; 150 (644e-54e)https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000009446
        • Lee K.T.
        • Mun G.H.
        A systematic review of functional donor-site morbidity after latissimus dorsi muscle transfer.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014; 134: 303-314https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000000365
        • Petrek J.A.
        • Senie R.T.
        • Peters M.
        • Rosen P.P.
        Lymphedema in a cohort of breast carcinoma survivors 20 years after diagnosis.
        Cancer. 2001; 92 (2-9): 1368-1377https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0142(20010915)92:6<1368::aid-cncr1459>3.0.co