Advertisement
Research Article| Volume 49, ISSUE 3, P647-654, March 2023

The importance of surgical resection in the management of rectal sarcoma: A national cancer database analysis of 133 cases

  • Michael R. Freund
    Affiliations
    Ellen Leifer Shulman and Steven Shulman Digestive Disease Center, Cleveland Clinic Florida, Weston, FL, USA

    Department of General Surgery, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Israel
    Search for articles by this author
  • Sameh Hany Emile
    Affiliations
    Ellen Leifer Shulman and Steven Shulman Digestive Disease Center, Cleveland Clinic Florida, Weston, FL, USA

    Colorectal Surgery Unit, Mansoura University Hospitals, Mansoura, Egypt
    Search for articles by this author
  • Nir Horesh
    Affiliations
    Ellen Leifer Shulman and Steven Shulman Digestive Disease Center, Cleveland Clinic Florida, Weston, FL, USA

    Department of Surgery and Transplantations, Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel
    Search for articles by this author
  • Zoe Garoufalia
    Affiliations
    Ellen Leifer Shulman and Steven Shulman Digestive Disease Center, Cleveland Clinic Florida, Weston, FL, USA
    Search for articles by this author
  • Rachel Gefen
    Affiliations
    Ellen Leifer Shulman and Steven Shulman Digestive Disease Center, Cleveland Clinic Florida, Weston, FL, USA
    Search for articles by this author
  • Steven D. Wexner
    Correspondence
    Corresponding author. Corresponding author. Cleveland Clinic Florida, Department of Colorectal Surgery, 2950 Cleveland Clinic Blvd, Weston, FL, 33331, USA.
    Affiliations
    Ellen Leifer Shulman and Steven Shulman Digestive Disease Center, Cleveland Clinic Florida, Weston, FL, USA
    Search for articles by this author
Published:October 19, 2022DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejso.2022.10.014

      Abstract

      Background and purpose

      Rectal sarcomas (RS) are rare malignant tumors with a very poor prognosis. This study aimed to assess the characteristics, treatment, and outcomes of RS in the United States.

      Methods

      This study was a retrospective analysis of the National Cancer Database (NCDB) from 2004 to 2019 of patients with a diagnosis of RS. The main outcome measures were overall survival (OS) and its predictors.

      Results

      133 RS patients (39.1% female) with a mean age of 65.7 ± 15.6 years were included in the study. Mean tumor size was 6.1 ± 3 cm. The crude OS rate was 22.5% and median survival duration was 10.1 (IQR: 3.2–21) months. Factors associated with an improved OS on were private insurance (HR = 0.23, p = 0.001) and undergoing surgery (HR 0.23, p < 0.001), Factors associated with poor survival were age (HR 1.02, p = 0.005), male sex (HR 2.27, p = 0.001), Charlson score of 3 (HR 5.17, p = 0.003), and positive resection margins (HR: 2.64, p = 0.01). Multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed that male sex (HR 2.16, p = 0.04) and positive resection margins (HR 2.31, p = 0.03) were predictors of poor survival whereas surgery was an independent predictor of improved OS (HR 0.321, p < 0.001)

      Conclusions

      RS is a very rare rectal malignancy with an even poorer prognosis than previously reported. However, undergoing surgery with curative intent while obtaining negative margins may confer better OS.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to European Journal of Surgical Oncology
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Nassif M.O.
        • Trabulsi N.H.
        • Dunn K.M.B.
        • et al.
        Soft tissue tumors of the anorectum: rare, complex and misunderstood.
        J Gastrointest Oncol. 2013; 4: 82https://doi.org/10.3978/J.ISSN.2078-6891.2012.042
      1. Fletcher C. Unni K. Mertens F. World Health Organization classification of tumours. Pathology and genetics of tumours of soft tissue and bone. IARC Press, Lyon2002
        • van Rees J.M.
        • Elferink M.A.G.
        • Tanis P.J.
        • et al.
        mThe incidence, treatment and survival of patients with rare types of rectal malignancies in The Netherlands: a population-based study between 1989 and 2018.
        Eur J Cancer. 2021; 152: 183-192https://doi.org/10.1016/J.EJCA.2021.04.036
        • Thiels C.A.
        • Bergquist J.R.
        • Krajewski A.C.
        • et al.
        Outcomes of primary colorectal sarcoma: a national cancer data base (NCDB) review.
        J Gastrointest Surg. 2017; 21: 560-568https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-016-3347-0
        • Wang H.S.
        • Chen W.S.
        • Lin T.C.
        • et al.
        Leiomyosarcoma of the rectum: a series of twelve cases.
        Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi (Taipei). 1996; 57: 280-283
        • Yeh C.Y.
        • Chen H.H.
        • Tang R.
        • et al.
        Surgical outcome after curative resection of rectal leiomyosarcoma.
        Dis Colon Rectum. 2000; 43: 1517-1521https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02236730
        • Randleman C.D.
        • Wolff B.G.
        • Dozois R.R.
        • et al.
        Leiomyosarcoma of the rectum and anus. A series of 22 cases.
        Int J Colorectal Dis. 1989; 4: 91-96https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01646866
        • Khalifa A.A.
        • Bong W.L.
        • Rao V.K.
        • Williams M.J.
        Leiomyosarcoma of the rectum - report of a case and review of the literature.
        Dis Colon Rectum. 1986; 29: 427-432https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02555068
        • Hishida Y.
        • Ishida M.
        Smooth-muscle tumors of the rectum in Japanese.
        Dis Colon Rectum. 1974; 17: 226-234https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02588106
        • Asuncion C.M.
        Leiomyosarcoma of the rectum - report of two cases.
        Dis Colon Rectum. 1969; 12: 281-287https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02617285
        • Diamante M.
        • Bacon H.E.
        Leiomyosarcoma of the rectum: report of a case.
        Dis Colon Rectum. 1967; 10: 347-351https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02617016
        • Quan S.H.Q.
        • Berg J.W.
        Leiomyoma and leiomyosarcoma of the rectum.
        Dis Colon Rectum. 1962; 5: 415-425https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02616645
        • Anderson P.A.
        • Dockerty M.B.
        • Buie L.A.
        Myomatous tumors of the rectum (leiomyomas and myosarcomas).
        Surgery. 1950; 28: 642-650
        • Meijer S.
        • Peretz T.
        • Gaynor J.J.
        • et al.
        Primary colorectal sarcoma. A retrospective review and prognostic factor study of 50 consecutive patients.
        Arch Surg. 1990; 125: 1163-1168https://doi.org/10.1001/ARCHSURG.1990.01410210089014
        • Tsekouras D.K.
        • Katsaragakis S.
        • Theodorou D.
        • et al.
        Rectal carcinosarcoma: a case report and review of literature.
        World J Gastroenterol. 2006; 12: 1481-1484https://doi.org/10.3748/WJG.V12.I9.1481
        • Wolf O.
        • Glaser F.
        • Kuntz C.
        • Lehnert T.
        Endorectal ultrasound and leiomyosarcoma of the rectum.
        Clin Invest. 1994; 72: 381-384https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00252832
        • Luna-Pérez P.
        • Rodríguez D.F.
        • Luján L.
        • et al.
        Colorectal sarcoma: analysis of failure patterns.
        J Surg Oncol. 1998; 69 (https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1096-9098(199809)69:1<36::aid-jso7>3.0.co;2-l): 36-40
        • Paschke S.
        • Jafarov S.
        • Staib L.
        • et al.
        Are colon and rectal cancer two different tumor entities? A proposal to abandon the term colorectal cancer.
        Int J Mol Sci. 2018; 19: 2577https://doi.org/10.3390/IJMS19092577
        • Casali P.G.
        • Blay J.Y.
        • Abecassis N.
        • et al.
        Gastrointestinal stromal tumours: ESMO-EURACAN-GENTURIS Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up.
        Ann Oncol. 2022; 33 (Electronic address: [email protected]) (Epub 2021 Sep 21. PMID: 34560242): 20-33https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annonc.2021.09.005
        • Cooper C.R.
        • Scully B.F.
        • Lee-Kong S.
        Colorectal sarcoma: more than a gastrointestinal stromal tumor.
        Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018; 3 (PMID: 30148227; PMCID: PMC6088172): 42https://doi.org/10.21037/tgh.2018.07.05
        • Deyo R.A.
        • Cherkin D.C.
        • Ciol M.A.
        Adapting a clinical comorbidity index for use with ICD-9-CM administrative databases.
        J Clin Epidemiol. 1992; 45 (PMID: 1607900): 613-619https://doi.org/10.1016/0895-4356(92)90133-8
        • Luna-Pérez P.
        • Rodríguez D.F.
        • Luján L.
        • et al.
        Colorectal sarcoma: analysis of failure patterns.
        J Surg Oncol. 1998; 69 (https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1096-9098(199809)69:1<36::aid-jso7>3.0.co;2-l): 36-40
      2. Relative Survival. https://seer.cancer.gov/seerstat/508_WebHelp/Relative_Survival.htm. Accessed 15 May 2022.

        • Khalifa A.A.
        • Bong W.L.
        • Rao V.K.
        • Williams M.J.
        Leiomyosarcoma of the rectum. Report of a case and review of the literature.
        Dis Colon Rectum. 1986; 29: 427-432https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02555068
        • Cuffy M.
        • Abir F.
        • Longo W.E.
        Management of less common tumors of the colon, rectum, and anus.
        Clin Colorectal Cancer. 2006; 5: 327-337https://doi.org/10.3816/CCC.2006.N.002
        • Choi J.H.
        • Ro J.Y.
        The 2020 WHO classification of tumors of soft tissue: selected changes and new entities.
        Adv Anat Pathol. 2021; 28: 44-58https://doi.org/10.1097/PAP.0000000000000284
        • Mastoraki A.
        • Psarras D.
        • Mastoraki S.
        • et al.
        Rectum sarcoma: challenging diagnostic and therapeutic modalities.
        J Gastrointest Cancer. 2013; 44: 260-263https://doi.org/10.1007/S12029-013-9506-6
      3. Pathology and genetics of tumours of soft tissue and bone - NLM Catalog - NCBI. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nlmcatalog/101184724. Accessed 15 May 2022.

        • Flugstad D.L.
        • Wilke C.P.
        • McNutt M.A.
        • et al.
        Importance of surgical resection in the successful management of soft tissue sarcoma.
        Arch Surg. 1999; 134: 856-862https://doi.org/10.1001/ARCHSURG.134.8.856
        • Morton D.L.
        • Eilber F.R.
        • Townsend C.M.
        • et al.
        Limb salvage from a multidisciplinary treatment approach for skeletal and soft tissue sarcomas of the extremity.
        Ann Surg. 1976; 184: 268-278https://doi.org/10.1097/00000658-197609000-00004
        • Kaushal A.
        • Citrin D.
        The role of radiation therapy in the management of sarcomas.
        Surg Clin. 2008; 88: 629https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SUC.2008.03.005
        • Bonvalot S.
        • Gronchi A.
        • le Péchoux C.
        • et al.
        Preoperative radiotherapy plus surgery versus surgery alone for patients with primary retroperitoneal sarcoma (EORTC-62092: STRASS): a multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial.
        Lancet Oncol. 2020; 21: 1366-1377https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(20)30446-0
        • Kepka L.
        • DeLaney T.F.
        • Suit H.D.
        • Goldberg S.I.
        Results of radiation therapy for unresected soft-tissue sarcomas.
        Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2005; 63: 852-859https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJROBP.2005.03.004
        • Weiser M.R.
        AJCC 8th edition: colorectal cancer.
        Ann Surg Oncol. 2018; 25: 1454-1455https://doi.org/10.1245/S10434-018-6462-1