Robot-assisted and conventional minimally invasive esophagectomy are associated with better postoperative results compared to hybrid and open transthoracic esophagectomy

References

1. • Gupta B.
   • Kumar N.
   Worldwide incidence, mortality and time trends for cancer of the oesophagus.
   Eur J Cancer Prev: the off. j. Europ. Cancer Preven. Org. (ECP). 2017; 26: 107-118
   View in Article

   • Google Scholar
2. • Omloo J.M.
   • Lagarde S.M.
   • Hulscher J.B.
   • Reitsma J.B.
   • Fockens P.
   • van Dekken H.
   • et al.
   Extended transthoracic resection compared with limited transhiatal resection for adenocarcinoma of the mid/distal esophagus: five-year survival of a randomized clinical trial.
   Ann Surg. 2007; 246: 992-1000
   View in Article

   • Google Scholar
3. • Gebski V.
   • Burmeister B.
   • Smithers B.M.
   • Foo K.
   • Zalcberg J.
   • Simes J.
   • Australasian Gastro-Intestinal Trials Group
   Survival benefits from neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy or chemotherapy in oesophageal carcinoma: a meta-analysis.
   Lancet Oncol. 2007; 8: 226-234
   View in Article

   • Google Scholar
4. • Hulscher J.B.
   • van Sandick J.W.
   • de Boer A.G.
   • Wijnhoven B.P.
   • Tijssen J.G.
   • Fockens P.
   • et al.
   Extended transthoracic resection compared with limited transhiatal resection for adenocarcinoma of the esophagus.
   N Engl J Med. 2002; 347: 1662-1669
   View in Article

   • Google Scholar
5. • Biere S.S.
   • van Berge Henegouwen M.I.
   • Maas K.W.
   • Bonavina L.
   • Rosman C.
   • Garcia J.R.
   • et al.
   Minimally invasive versus open oesophagectomy for patients with oesophageal cancer: a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial.
   Lancet. 2012; 379: 1887-1892
   View in Article

   • Google Scholar
6. • Maas K.W.
   • Cuesta M.A.
   • van Berge Henegouwen M.I.
   • Roig J.
   • Bonavina L.
   • Rosman C.
   • et al.
   Quality of life and late complications after minimally invasive compared to open esophagectomy: results of a randomized trial.
   World J Surg. 2015; 39: 1986-1993
   View in Article

   • Google Scholar
7. • Mariette C.
   • Markar S.R.
   • Dabakuyo-Yonli T.S.
   • Meunier B.
   • Pezet D.
   • Collet D.
   • et al.
   Fédération de Recherche en Chirurgie (French) and French Eso-Gastric Tumors (FREGAT) Working Group. Hybrid Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer.
   N Engl J Med. 2019 Jan 10; 380: 152-162
   View in Article

   • Google Scholar
8. • van der Sluis P.C.
   • van der Horst S.
   • May A.M.
   • Schippers C.
   • Brosens L.A.A.
   • Joore H.C.A.
   • et al.
   Robot-assisted minimally invasive thoracolaparoscopic esophagectomy versus open transthoracic esophagectomy for resectable esophageal cancer: a randomized controlled trial.
   Ann Surg. 2019; 269: 621-630
   View in Article

   • Google Scholar
9. • Low D.E.
   • Alderson D.
   • Cecconello I.
   • et al.
   International Consensus on standardization of data collection for complications associated with esophagectomy: esophagectomy complications Consensus group (ECCG).
   Ann Surg. 2015; 262: 286-294
   View in Article

   • Google Scholar
10. • Dindo D.
    • Demartines N.
    • Clavien P.A.
    Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey.
    Ann Surg. 2004; 24: 205-213
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
11. • Hadzijusufovic E.
    • Tagkalos E.
    • Neumann H.
    • Babic B.
    • Heinrich S.
    • Lang H.
    • et al.
    Preoperative endoscopic pyloric balloon dilatation decreases the rate of delayed gastric emptying after Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy.
    Dis Esophagus. 2018; ([epub ahead of print])
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
12. • Naruke T.
    • Tsuchiya R.
    • Kondo H.
    • Nakayama H.
    • Asamura H.
    Lymph node sampling in lung cancer: how should it be done?.
    Eur J Cardio Thorac Surg. 1999; 16: S17-S24
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
13. • Rizk N.P.
    • Ishwaran H.
    • Rice T.W.
    • et al.
    Optimum lymphadenectomy for esophageal cancer.
    Ann Surg. 2010; 251: 46-50
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
14. • Grimminger P.P.
    • Lang H.
    Totally minimally invasive esophagectomy and gastric pull-up reconstruction with an intrathoracic circular stapled anastomosis with a team of two (surgeon and assistant only).
    Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2018; 66: 401-403
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
15. • Grimminger P.P.
    • Hadzijusufovic E.
    • Babic B.
    • van der Sluis P.C.
    • Lang H.
    Innovative fully robotic 4-arm Ivor Lewis esophagectomy for esophageal cancer (RAMIE4).
    Dis Esophagus, 2019 ([Epub ahead of print])
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
16. • van der Sluis P.C.
    • Tagkalos E.
    • Hadzijusufovic E.
    • Babic B.
    • Uzun E.
    • van Hillegersberg R.
    • et al.
    Robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy with intrathoracic anastomosis (ivor Lewis): promising results in 100 consecutive patients (the European experience).
    J Gastrointest Surg. 2020; ([epub aheadof print])
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
17. • D'Journo X.B.
    Clinical implication of the innovations of the 8th edition of the TNM classification for esophageal and esophago-gastric cancer.
    J Thorac Dis. 2018; 10: 2671-2681
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
18. • Verhage R.J.
    • Zandvoort H.J.
    • ten Kate F.J.
    • van Hillegersberg R.
    How to define a positive circumferential resection margin in T3 adenocarcinoma of the esophagus.
    Am J Surg Pathol. 2011; 35: 919-926
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
19. • Berlth F.
    • Plum P.S.
    • Chon S.H.
    • Gutschow C.A.
    • Bollschweiler E.
    • Hölscher A.H.
    Total minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal adenocarcinoma reduces postoperative pain and pneumonia compared to hybrid esophagectomy.
    Surg Endosc. 2018; 32: 4957-4965
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
20. • Gooszen J.A.H.
    • Goense L.
    • Gisbertz S.S.
    • Ruurda J.P.
    • van Hillegersberg R.
    • van Berge Henegouwen M.I.
    Intrathoracic versus cervical anastomosis and predictors of anastomotic leakage after oesophagectomy for cancer.
    Br J Surg. 2018 Apr; 105: 552-560
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
21. • van Workum F.
    • Slaman A.E.
    • van Berge Henegouwen M.I.
    • Gisbertz S.S.
    • Kouwenhoven E.A.
    • van Det M.J.
    • et al.
    Propensity score-matched analysis comparing minimally invasive ivor Lewis versus minimally invasive mckeown esophagectomy.
    Ann Surg. 2020 Jan; 271: 128-133
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
22. • van Workum F.
    • Verstegen M.H.P.
    • Klarenbeek B.R.
    • Bouwense S.A.W.
    • van Berge Henegouwen M.I.
    • Daams F.
    • et al.
    • ICAN collaborative research group
    Intrathoracic vs cervical anastomosis after totally or hybrid minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a randomized clinical trial.
    JAMA Surg. 2021 Jul 1; 156 (PMID: 33978698; PMCID: PMC8117060): 601-610https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2021.1555
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
23. • Tagkalos E.
    • Goense L.
    • Hoppe-Lotichius M.
    • Ruurda J.P.
    • Babic B.
    • Hadzijusufovic E.
    • et al.
    Robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE) compared to conventional minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) for esophageal cancer: a propensity-matched analysis.
    Dis Esophagus. 2019; ([Epub ahead of print])
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
24. • Visser E.
    • van Rossum P.S.N.
    • Ruurda J.P.
    • van Hillegersberg R.
    Impact of lymph node yield on overall survival in patients treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by esophagectomy for cancer: a population-based cohort study in The Netherlands.
    Ann Surg. 2017; 266: 863-869
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
25. • Chao Y.K.
    • Li Z.G.
    • Wen Y.W.
    • Kim D.J.
    • Park S.Y.
    • Chang Y.L.
    • et al.
    Robotic-assisted Esophagectomy vs Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Esophagectomy (REVATE): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.
    Trials. 2019; 20: 346
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
26. • Sakamoto T.
    • Fujiogi M.
    • Matsui H.
    • Fushimi K.
    • Yasunaga H.
    Comparing perioperative mortality and morbidity of minimally invasive esophagectomy versus open esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a nationwide retrospective analysis.
    Ann Surg. 2021 Aug 1; 274: 324-330https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000003500
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar