Advertisement

Achievements in colorectal cancer care during 8 years of auditing in The Netherlands

      Abstract

      Introduction

      The efficacy of auditing is still a subject of debate and concerns exist whether auditing promotes risk averse behaviour of physicians. This study evaluates the achievements made in colorectal cancer surgery since the start of a national clinical audit and assesses potential signs of risk averse behaviour.

      Methods

      Data were extracted from the Dutch ColoRectal Audit (2009–2016). Trends in outcomes were evaluated by uni and multivariable analyses. Patients were stratified according to operative risks and changes in outcomes were expressed as absolute (ARR) and relative risk reduction (RRR). To assess signs of risk averse behaviour, trends in stoma construction in rectal cancer were analysed.

      Results

      Postoperative mortality decreased from 3.4% to 1.8% in colon cancer and from 2.3% to 1% in rectal cancer. Surgical and non-surgical complications increased, but with less reintervention. For colon cancer, the high-risk elderly patients had the largest ARR for complicated postoperative course (6.4%) and mortality (5.9%). The proportion of patients receiving a diverting stoma or end colostomy after a (L)AR decreased 11% and 7%, respectively. In low rectal cancer, patients increasingly received a non-diverted primary anastomosis (5.4% in 2011 and 14.4% in 2016).

      Conclusions

      No signs of risk averse behaviour was found since the start of the audit. Especially the high-risk elderly patients seem to have benefitted from improvements made in colon cancer treatment in the past 8 years. For rectal cancer, trends towards the construction of more primary anastomoses are seen. Future quality improvement measures should focus on reducing surgical and non-surgical complications.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to European Journal of Surgical Oncology
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Henneman D.
        • Ten Berge M.G.
        • Snijders H.S.
        • van Leersum N.J.
        • Fiocco M.
        • Wiggers T.
        • et al.
        Safety of elective colorectal cancer surgery: non-surgical complications and colectomies are targets for quality improvement.
        J Surg Oncol. 2014; 109: 567-573
        • Hu C.Y.
        • Bailey C.E.
        • You Y.N.
        • Skibber J.M.
        • Rodriguez-Bigas M.A.
        • Feig B.W.
        • et al.
        Time trend analysis of primary tumor resection for stage IV colorectal cancer: less surgery, improved survival.
        JAMA Surg. 2015; 150: 245-251
        • Iversen L.H.
        • Green A.
        • Ingeholm P.
        • Osterlind K.
        • Gogenur I.
        Improved survival of colorectal cancer in Denmark during 2001-2012-The efforts of several national initiatives.
        Acta Oncol. 2016; 55: 10-23
        • van Gijn W.
        • van de Velde C.J.
        Improving quality of cancer care through surgical audit.
        Eur J Surg Oncol. 2010; 36: S23-S26
        • Habib M.R.
        • Solomon M.J.
        • Young J.M.
        • Armstrong B.K.
        • O'Connell D.
        • Armstrong K.
        Evidence-based and clinical outcome scores to facilitate audit and feedback for colorectal cancer care.
        Dis Colon Rectum. 2009; 52 (Discussion 22–23): 616-622
        • Cheung A.
        • Weir M.
        • Mayhew A.
        • Kozloff N.
        • Brown K.
        • Grimshaw J.
        Overview of systematic reviews of the effectiveness of reminders in improving healthcare professional behavior.
        Syst Rev. 2012; 1: 36
        • Patwardhan M.B.
        • Samsa G.P.
        • McCrory D.C.
        • Fisher D.A.
        • Mantyh C.R.
        • Morse M.A.
        • et al.
        Cancer care quality measures: diagnosis and treatment of colorectal cancer.
        Evid Rep Technol Assess Full Rep. 2006; : 1-116
        • Benjamin A.
        Audit: how to do it in practice.
        BMJ. 2008; 336: 1241-1245
        • Smith R.
        Audit and research.
        BMJ. 1992; 305: 905-906
        • Wibe A.
        • Moller B.
        • Norstein J.
        • Carlsen E.
        • Wiig J.N.
        • Heald R.J.
        • et al.
        A national strategic change in treatment policy for rectal cancer–implementation of total mesorectal excision as routine treatment in Norway. A national audit.
        Dis Colon Rectum. 2002; 45: 857-866
        • Ivers N.
        • Jamtvedt G.
        • Flottorp S.
        • Young J.M.
        • Odgaard-Jensen J.
        • French S.D.
        • et al.
        Audit and feedback: effects on professional practice and healthcare outcomes.
        Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Jun 13; CD000259https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD000259.pub3
        • Van Leersum N.J.
        • Snijders H.S.
        • Henneman D.
        • Kolfschoten N.E.
        • Gooiker G.A.
        • ten Berge M.G.
        • et al.
        The Dutch surgical colorectal audit.
        Eur J Surg Oncol. 2013; 39: 1063-1070
        • Elferink M.A.
        • Wouters M.W.
        • Krijnen P.
        • Lemmens V.E.
        • Jansen-Landheer M.L.
        • van de Velde C.J.
        • et al.
        Disparities in quality of care for colon cancer between hospitals in The Netherlands.
        Eur J Surg Oncol. 2010; 36: S64-S73
        • van Leersum N.J.
        • Aalbers A.G.
        • Snijders H.S.
        • Henneman D.
        • Wouters M.W.
        • Tollenaar R.A.
        • et al.
        Synchronous colorectal carcinoma: a risk factor in colorectal cancer surgery.
        Dis Colon Rectum. 2014; 57: 460-466
        • Amri R.
        • Bordeianou L.G.
        • Sylla P.
        • Berger D.L.
        Impact of screening colonoscopy on outcomes in colon cancer surgery.
        JAMA Surg. 2013; 148: 747-754
      1. Birthyears invited per year for the Dutch Colorectal Screening program. http://www.rivm.nl/Documenten_en_publicaties/Algemeen_Actueel/Brochures/Preventie_Zorg_Ziekte/Darmkanker/Uitnodigingsoverzicht_bevolkingsonderzoek_darmkanker

        • Kolfschoten N.E.
        • Marang van de Mheen P.J.
        • Gooiker G.A.
        • Eddes E.H.
        • Kievit J.
        • Tollenaar R.A.
        • et al.
        Variation in case-mix between hospitals treating colorectal cancer patients in The Netherlands.
        Eur J Surg Oncol. 2011; 37: 956-963
        • van Vugt J.L.
        • Reisinger K.W.
        • Derikx J.P.
        • Boerma D.
        • Stoot J.H.
        Improving the outcomes in oncological colorectal surgery.
        World J Gastroenterol. 2014; 20: 12445-12457
        • Govaert J.A.
        • Fiocco M.
        • van Dijk W.A.
        • Scheffer A.C.
        • de Graaf E.J.
        • Tollenaar R.A.
        • et al.
        Costs of complications after colorectal cancer surgery in The Netherlands: building the business case for hospitals.
        Eur J Surg Oncol. 2015; 41: 1059-1067
        • Platell C.
        • Barwood N.
        • Dorfmann G.
        • Makin G.
        The incidence of anastomotic leaks in patients undergoing colorectal surgery.
        Colorectal Dis. 2007; 9: 71-79
        • Huser N.
        • Michalski C.W.
        • Erkan M.
        • Schuster T.
        • Rosenberg R.
        • Kleeff J.
        • et al.
        Systematic review and meta-analysis of the role of defunctioning stoma in low rectal cancer surgery.
        Ann Surg. 2008; 248: 52-60
        • Snijders H.S.
        • van Leersum N.J.
        • Henneman D.
        • de Vries A.C.
        • Tollenaar R.A.
        • Stiggelbout A.M.
        • et al.
        Optimal treatment strategy in rectal cancer surgery: should we Be cowboys or chickens?.
        Ann Surg Oncol. 2015; 22: 3582-3589
        • Gietelink L.
        • Wouters M.W.
        • Bemelman W.A.
        • Dekker J.W.
        • Tollenaar R.A.
        • Tanis P.J.
        Reduced 30-day mortality after laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery: a population based study from the Dutch surgical colorectal audit (DSCA).
        Ann Surg. 2016; 264: 135-140
        • Pucciarelli S.
        • Zorzi M.
        • Gennaro N.
        • Gagliardi G.
        • Restivo A.
        • Saugo M.
        • et al.
        In-hospital mortality, 30-day readmission, and length of hospital stay after surgery for primary colorectal cancer: a national population-based study.
        Eur J Surg Oncol. 2017; 43: 1312-1323
        • Faiz O.
        • Haji A.
        • Burns E.
        • Bottle A.
        • Kennedy R.
        • Aylin P.
        Hospital stay amongst patients undergoing major elective colorectal surgery: predicting prolonged stay and readmissions in NHS hospitals.
        Colorectal Dis. 2011; 13: 816-822
        • Damle R.N.
        • Cherng N.B.
        • Flahive J.M.
        • Davids J.S.
        • Maykel J.A.
        • Sturrock P.R.
        • et al.
        Clinical and financial impact of hospital readmissions after colorectal resection: predictors, outcomes, and costs.
        Dis Colon Rectum. 2014; 57: 1421-1429
        • Bradley E.H.
        • Holmboe E.S.
        • Mattera J.A.
        • Roumanis S.A.
        • Radford M.J.
        • Krumholz H.M.
        Data feedback efforts in quality improvement: lessons learned from US hospitals.
        Qual Saf Health Care. 2004; 13: 26-31
        • Larson E.L.
        • Patel S.J.
        • Evans D.
        • Saiman L.
        Feedback as a strategy to change behaviour: the devil is in the details.
        J Eval Clin Pract. 2013; 19: 230-234
        • Oliphant R.
        • Nicholson G.A.
        • Horgan P.G.
        • Molloy R.G.
        • McMillan D.C.
        • Morrison D.S.
        Contribution of surgical specialization to improved colorectal cancer survival.
        Br J Surg. 2013; 100: 1388-1395
        • Kolfschoten N.E.
        • van Leersum N.J.
        • Gooiker G.A.
        • Marang van de Mheen P.J.
        • Eddes E.H.
        • Kievit J.
        • et al.
        Successful and safe introduction of laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery in Dutch hospitals.
        Ann Surg. 2013; 257: 916-921
        • van den Broek C.B.
        • van Gijn W.
        • Bastiaannet E.
        • Moller B.
        • Johansson R.
        • Elferink M.A.
        • et al.
        Differences in pre-operative treatment for rectal cancer between Norway, Sweden, Denmark, Belgium and The Netherlands.
        Eur J Surg Oncol. 2014; 40: 1789-1796
        • van Leersum N.J.
        • Snijders H.S.
        • Wouters M.W.
        • Henneman D.
        • Marijnen C.A.
        • Rutten H.R.
        • et al.
        Evaluating national practice of preoperative radiotherapy for rectal cancer based on clinical auditing.
        Eur J Surg Oncol. 2013; 39: 1000-1006
        • Gietelink L.
        • Wouters M.
        • Marijnen C.A.M.
        • van Groningen J.
        • van Leersum N.
        • Beets-Tan R.G.H.
        • et al.
        Changes in nationwide use of preoperative radiotherapy for rectal cancer after revision of the national colorectal cancer guideline.
        Eur J Surg Oncol. 2017; 43: 1297-1303