Advertisement

Global curriculum in research literacy for the surgical oncologist

Published:December 10, 2017DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejso.2017.07.017

      Abstract

      Background

      The ability to provide optimal care to cancer patients depends on awareness of current evidence-based practices emanating from research or involvement in research where circumstances permit. The significant global variations in cancer-related research activity and its correlation to cancer-specific outcomes may have an influence on the care provided to cancer patients and their outcomes. The aim of this project is to develop a global curriculum in research literacy for the surgical oncologist.

      Materials and Methods

      The leadership of the Society of Surgical Oncology and European Society of Surgical Oncology convened a global curriculum committee to develop a global curriculum in research literacy for the Surgical Oncologist.

      Results

      A global curriculum in research literacy is developed to incorporate the required domains considered to be essential to interpret the published research or become involved in research activity where circumstances permit. The purpose of this curriculum is to promote research literacy for the surgical oncologist, wherever they are based. It does not mandate direct research participation which may not be feasible due to restrictions within the local health-care delivery environment, socio-economic priorities and the educational environment of the individual institution where they work.

      Conclusions

      A global curriculum in research literacy is proposed which may promote research literacy or encourage involvement in research activity where circumstances permit. It is hoped that this will enhance cancer-related research activity, promote awareness of optimal evidence-based practices and improve outcomes for cancer patients globally.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      References

        • Greenhalgh Trisha
        How to read a paper: the basics of evidence based medicine.
        Wiley-Blackwell, 5 Jan. 2006 (3rd Revised edition)
        • Torgerson D.J.
        • Torgerson C.J.
        Designing randomized trials in health, education and the social sciences: an introduction.
        Palgrave, MacMillan2008
        • Glasziou P.
        • Chalmers I.
        • Rawlins M.
        • McCulloch P.
        When are randomized trials unnecessary? Picking signals from noise.
        BMJ. 2007; 334: 349
        • Doren E.L.
        • Miranda R.N.
        • Selber J.C.
        • Garvey P.B.
        • Liu J.
        • Medeiros L.J.
        • et al.
        U.S. Epidemiology of breast implant-associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017 May; 139: 1042-1050https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000003282
        • Hunnisett A.
        BMJ research methods and reporting: reporting research.
        BMJ and BPP Publishers, 2016
        • McCulloch P.
        • Cook J.A.
        • Altman D.
        • Heneghan C.
        • Diener M.K.
        IDEAL Framework for surgical Innovation 1: the idea and development stages.
        BMJ. 2013; 346f3012
        • Tong A.
        • Sainsbury P.
        • Craig J.
        Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups.
        Int J Qual Health Care. 2007; 19: 349-357
        • Petrie Aviva
        • Sabin Caroline
        Medical statistics at a glance.
        3rd ed. Wiley-Blackwell publishers, 2013
        • Ahn R.
        • Woodbridge A.
        • Abraham A.
        • Saba S.
        • Korenstein D.
        • Madden E.
        • et al.
        Financial ties of principal investigators and randomized controlled trial outcomes: cross sectional study.
        BMJ. 2017 Jan 17; 356i6770
        • Shahzad Aamir
        Translational medicine: tools and techniques.
        1st ed. Academic Press, 25 Nov. 2015
        • Jalali Morteza
        • Saldanha Francesca Yvonne Louise
        • Jalali Mehdi
        Basic science methods for clinical researchers.
        Academic Press, 4 April 2017
        • Cross J.
        Impact factors – the basics.
        The E-Resources Management Handbook, UKSG, 2009
        • Brembs B.
        • Button K.
        • Munafò M.
        Deep impact: unintended consequences of journal rank.
        Front Hum Neurosci. 2013; 7: 1-12
        • Emanuel E.J.
        The Oxford textbook of clinical research ethics.
        Oxford University Press, Oxford, New York2008
        • Sales B.D.
        • Folkman S.
        Ethics in research with human participants.
        American Psychological Association, Washington, D.C.2000
        • Cutter L.
        Walter reed, yellow fever, and informed consent.
        Mil Med. 2016 Jan; 181: 90-91https://doi.org/10.7205/MILMED-D-15-00430
        • Katz J.
        The Nuremberg Code and the Nuremberg trial. A reappraisal.
        JAMA. 1996 Nov 27; 276: 1662-1666
        • Nuremberg Military Tribunal
        The nuremberg code.
        JAMA. 1996 Nov 27; 276: 1691
        • Krugman S.
        The Willowbrook hepatitis studies revisited: ethical aspects.
        Rev Infect Dis. 1986 Jan-Feb; 8: 157-162
        • Cobb W.M.
        The Tuskegee syphilis study.
        J Natl Med Assoc. 1973 Jul; 65: 345-348
        • World Medical Association
        World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects.
        JAMA. 2013 Nov 27; 310: 2191-2194https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2013.281053
        • Beecher Henry K.
        Ethics and clinical research.
        N Engl J Med. 1966; 274: 1354-1360https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM196606162742405
        • United States
        National commission for the protection of human subjects of biomedical and behavioral research. The Belmont report: ethical principles and guidelines for the protection of human subjects of research.
        The Commission, Bethesda, Md.1978
      1. National Science Foundation. The common rule for the protection of human subjects. 45 CFR Part 690: federal Policy for the Protection of Human Subjects.

        • Guidelines on good publication practice
        The COPE report.
        Committee on publication ethics (COPE), 2003
        • Are C.
        • Caniglia A.
        • Malik M.
        • Cummings C.
        • Lecoq C.
        • Berman R.
        • et al.
        Variations in training of surgical oncologists: proposal for a global curriculum.
        Ann Surg Oncol. 2016 Jun; 23 (Epub 2016 Apr 27. PMID: 27120186): 1769-1781https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-016-5238-8
        • Are C.
        • Berman R.S.
        • Wyld L.
        • Cummings C.
        • Lecoq C.
        • Audisio R.A.
        Global curriculum in surgical oncology.
        Ann Surg Oncol. 2016 Jun; 23 (Epub 2016 Apr 27. PMID: 27120187): 1782-1795https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-016-5239-7