Advertisement
Review| Volume 43, ISSUE 2, P270-277, February 2017

Complications of sentinel lymph node biopsy for melanoma – A systematic review of the literature

  • J.A. Moody
    Affiliations
    College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK
    Search for articles by this author
  • R.F. Ali
    Affiliations
    College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK
    Search for articles by this author
  • A.C. Carbone
    Affiliations
    Department of Plastic Surgery, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Mindelsohn Way, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2GW, UK
    Search for articles by this author
  • S. Singh
    Affiliations
    Department of Plastic Surgery, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Mindelsohn Way, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2GW, UK
    Search for articles by this author
  • J.T. Hardwicke
    Correspondence
    Corresponding author. Present address: School of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK.
    Affiliations
    College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK

    Department of Plastic Surgery, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Mindelsohn Way, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2GW, UK
    Search for articles by this author

      Abstract

      Purpose

      The complications reported after sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) for melanoma is highly variable in the worldwide literature; the overall complication rate varies between 1.8% and 29.9%. With heterogeneous reporting of morbidity data, no ‘average’ complication rates of this procedure have been reported. This systematic review aims to determine the complications rates associated with SLNB.

      Methods

      A systematic review of English-language literature from 2000 to 2015, which reported morbidity information about SLNB for melanoma, was performed. The methodological quality of the included studies was performed using the methodological index for non-randomised studies (MINORS) instrument and Detsky score. Pooled proportions of specific post-operative complications were constructed using a random effects statistical model, and subgroups including lymph node basin and continent of origin of the study were compared.

      Results

      After application of inclusion and exclusion criteria, 21 articles progressed to the final analysis. 9047 patients were included. The overall complication rate was 11.3% (95% CI: 8.1–15.0). The incidence of infection was 2.9% (95% CI 1.5–4.6); seroma 5.1% (95% CI: 2.5–8.6); haematoma 0.5% (95% CI: 0.3–0.9) lymphoedema 1.3% (95% CI: 0.5–2.6) and nerve injury 0.3% (95% CI: 0.1–0.6). There was no statistically significant difference in morbidity between the sites of SLNB or between continents.

      Discussion

      This study provides information about the incidence of complications after SLNB. It can be used to counsel patients about the procedure and it sets a benchmark against which surgeons can audit their practice.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to European Journal of Surgical Oncology
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

      1. Office for National Statistics. Table 3: incidence of malignant melanoma of skin amongst persons in England 1982–2011. http://www.ons.gov.uk/ons/about-ons/business-transparency/freedom-of-information/what-can-i-request/published-ad-hoc-data/health/february-2015/index.html; [accessed 07.04.16].

        • Morton D.L.
        • Thompson J.
        • Cochran A.J.
        • et al.
        Sentinel-node biopsy or nodal observation in melanoma.
        New Engl J Med. 2006; 355: 1307-1317
        • Balch C.M.
        • Gershenwalk J.E.
        • Soong S.J.
        • et al.
        Final version of 2009 AJCC melanoma staging and classification.
        J Clin Oncol. 2009; 27: 6199-6206
        • Marsden J.R.
        • Newton-Bishop J.A.
        • Burrows L.
        • et al.
        Revised U.K. guidelines for the management of cutaneous melanoma 2010.
        Br J Dermatol. 2010; 163: 238-256
        • Gershenwald J.E.
        • Thompson W.
        • Mansfield P.F.
        • et al.
        Multi-institutional melanoma lymphatic mapping experience: the prognostic value of sentinel lymph node status in 612 stage I or II melanoma patients.
        J Clin Oncol. 1999; 3: 976-983
        • Morton D.L.
        • Wen D.R.
        • Wong J.H.
        • Economou J.S.
        The technical details of intraoperative lymphatic mapping for early stage melanoma.
        Arch Surg. 1992; 127: 392-399
        • Tanis P.J.
        • Nieweg O.E.
        • Valdés Olmos R.A.
        • Rutgers E.J.T.H.
        • Kroon B.B.R.
        History of sentinel node and validation of technique.
        Breast Cancer Res. 2001; 3: 109
        • Read R.L.
        • Pasquali S.
        • Haydu L.
        • et al.
        Quality assurance in melanoma surgery: the evolving experience at a large tertiary referral centre.
        Eur J Surg Oncol. 2015; 41: 836
        • Hettiaratchy S.P.
        • Kang N.
        • O'Toole G.
        • Allan R.
        • Cook M.G.
        • Powell B.W.E.M.
        Sentinel lymph node biopsy in malignant melanoma: a series of 100 consecutive patients.
        Br J Plast Surg. 2000; 53: 559-562
        • Rughani M.G.
        • Swan M.C.
        • Adams T.S.
        • et al.
        Sentinel lymph node biopsy in melanoma: the oxford ten year clinical experience.
        J Plast Recontr Aesthet Surg. 2011; 64: 1284-1290
        • Ellis M.C.
        • Weerasinghe R.
        • Corless C.L.
        • Vetto J.T.
        Sentinel lymph node staging of cutaneous melanoma: predictors and outcomes.
        Am J Surg. 2010; 199: 668
        • Wrightson W.R.
        • Wong S.L.
        • Edwards M.J.
        • et al.
        Complications associated with sentinel lymph node biopsy for melanoma.
        Ann Surg Oncol. 2003; 10: 676-680
        • Roaten J.B.
        • Pearlman N.
        • Gonzalez R.
        • Gonzalez R.
        • McCarter M.
        Identifying risk factors for complications following sentinel lymph node biopsy for melanoma.
        Arch Surg. 2005; 140: 85-89
        • Chakera A.H.
        • Drzewiecki K.
        • Eigtved A.
        • Juhl B.
        Sentinel node biopsy for melaonoma: a study of 241 patients.
        Melanoma Res. 2004; 14: 521-526
        • Cigna E.
        • Gradilone A.
        • Ribuffo D.
        • et al.
        Morbidity of selective lymph node biopsy for melanoma: meta-analysis of complications.
        Tumori. 2012; 98: 94-98
        • Moher D.
        • Liberati A.
        • Tetzlaff J.
        • Altman D.G.
        Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement.
        Int J Surg. 2010; 8: 336-341
        • Slim K.
        • Nini E.
        • Forestier D.
        • Kwiatkowski F.
        • Panis Y.
        • Chipponi J.
        Methodological index for non-randomised studies (MINORS): development and validation of a new instrument.
        ANZ J Surg. 2003; 73: 712-716
        • Detsky A.S.
        • Naylor C.D.
        • O'Rourke K.
        • McGeer A.J.
        • L'Abbé K.A.
        Incorporating variations in the quality of individual randomized trials into meta-analysis.
        J Clin Epidemiol. 1992; 45: 255-265
        • Bhandari M.
        • Richards R.R.
        • Sprague S.
        • Schemitsch E.H.
        The quality of reporting of randomized trials in the journal of bone and joint surgery from 1988 through 2000.
        J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2002; 84A: 388-396
        • Hardwicke J.T.
        • Bechar J.A.
        • Hodson J.
        • Osmani O.
        • Park A.J.
        Fistula after single-stage primary hypospadias repair- A systematic review of the literature.
        J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2015; 68: 1647-1655
        • Cochrane W.G.
        The combination of estimates from different experiments.
        Biometrics. 1954; : 101-129
        • Freeman M.F.
        • Tukey J.W.
        Transformations related to the angular and the square root.
        Ann Math Stat. 1950; 21: 607-611
        • DerSimonian R.
        • Laird N.
        Meta-analysis in clinical trials.
        Control Clin Trials. 1986; 7: 177-188
        • Biver-Dalle C.
        • Puzenat E.
        • Puyraveau
        • et al.
        Sentinel lymph node biopsy in melanoma: our 8-year clinical experience in a single French institute (2002–2009).
        BMC Dermatol. 2012; 12: 21
        • Covarelli P.
        • Badolato M.
        • Tomassini G.M.
        • et al.
        Sentinel lymph node biopsy under local anaesthesia versus general anaesthesia: reliability and cost-effectiveness analysis in 153 patients with malignant melanoma.
        In Vivo. 2012; 26: 315-318
        • Estourgie S.H.
        • Nieweg O.E.
        • Valdés Olmos R.A.
        • Hoefnagel C.A.
        • Kroon B.B.R.
        Review and evaluation of sentinel node procedures in 250 melanoma patients with a median follow-up of 6 years.
        Ann Surg Oncol. 2003; 10: 681-688
        • Jansen L.
        • Nieweg O.E.
        • Peterse J.L.
        • Hoefnagel C.A.
        • Valdés Olmos R.A.
        • Kroon B.B.R.
        Reliability of sentinel lymph node biopsy for staging melanoma.
        Br J Surg. 2000; 87: 484-489
        • Ling A.
        • Dawkins R.
        • Bailey M.
        • et al.
        Short-term morbidity associated with sentinel lymph node biopsy in cutaneous malignant melanoma.
        Australas J Dermatol. 2010; 51: 13-17
        • Morton D.L.
        • Cochran A.J.
        • Thompson J.F.
        • et al.
        Sentinel node biopsy for early stage melanoma. accuracy and morbidity in MSLT-I an international multicenter trial.
        Ann Surg. 2005; 242: 302-313
        • Rødgaard J.C.
        • Kramer S.
        • Stolle L.B.
        Sentinel node biopsy (SNB) in malignant melanoma as same day procedure vs delayed procedure: clinical and economic outcome.
        J Plast Surg Hand Surg. 2014; 48: 265-269
        • Roulin D.
        • Matter M.
        • Bady P.
        • et al.
        Prognostic value of sentinel node biopsy in 327 prospective melanoma patients from a single institution.
        Eur J Surg Oncol. 2008; 34: 673-679
        • Stoffels I.
        • Dissemon J.
        • Körber A.
        • et al.
        Reliability and cost-effectiveness of sentinel lymph node excision under local anaesthesia versus general anaesthesia for malignant melanoma: a retrospective analysis in 300 patients with malignant melanoma AJCC stages I and II.
        J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2011; 25: 306-310
        • Topping A.
        • Dewar D.
        • Rose V.
        • et al.
        Five years of sentinel node biopsy for melanoma: the St George's melanoma unit experience.
        Br J Plast Surg. 2004; 57: 97-104
        • Wasserberg N.
        • Tulchinsky H.
        • Schachter J.
        • Feinmesser M.
        • Gutman H.
        Sentinel-lymph node biopsy (SLNB) for melanoma is not complication-free.
        Eur J Surg Oncol. 2004; 30: 851-856
        • Kjerkegaard U.
        • Eldon M.
        • Sjogren P.
        • Stolle L.B.
        A single-centre retrospective study on 659 re-excisions of mealaoma and 769 sentinel node biopsies in 2008–2012.
        Eur J Plast Surg. 2015; 38: 471-478
        • Lock-Anderson J.
        • Horn J.
        • Sjostrand H.
        • Nurnberg B.
        • Stokholm K.H.
        Sentinel lymph node biopsy in cutaenous melanoma.
        Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg. 2006; 40: 24-31
        • Van den Broek F.J.
        • Sloots P.C.
        • de Waard J.W.
        • Roumen R.M.
        Sentinel lymph node biopsy for cutaneous melanoma: results of 10 years' experience in two regional training hospitals in the Netherlands.
        Int J Clin Oncol. 2013; 18: 428-434
        • Hardwicke J.T.
        • Landini G.
        • Richard B.M.
        Fistula incidence after primary cleft palate repair: a systematic review of the literature.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014; 134: 618e-627e
      2. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Health Statistics. Underlying Cause of Death 1999–2014 on CDC WONDER Online Database, released 2015. http://wonder.cdc.gov/ucd-icd10.html; [accessed 07.04.16].

      3. World Health Organisation. WHO guidelines for safe surgery: 2009: safe surgery saves lives. http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/44185/1/9789241598552_eng.pdf; [accessed 07.04.16].

        • Kyrgidis A.
        • Tzellos T.
        • Mocellin S.
        • et al.
        Lymph node biopsy following lymph node dissection for localised skin cancer.
        Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015; (CD010307)
        • Wilke L.G.
        • McCall L.M.
        • Posther K.E.
        • et al.
        Surgical complications associated with sentinel lymph node biopsy: results from a prospective international cooperative group trial.
        Ann Surg Oncol. 2006; 13: 491-500