Advertisement

Phenotypic analysis of familial breast cancer: Comparison of BRCAx tumors with BRCA1-, BRCA2-carriers and non-familial breast cancer

Published:February 16, 2015DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejso.2015.01.021

      Abstract

      Aims

      Women with inherited pathogenic mutations in the BRCA1 or BRCA2 genes have up to an 85% risk of developing breast cancer in their lifetime. However, only about 20% of familial breast cancer is attributed to mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2, while a further 5–10% are attributed to mutations in other rare susceptibility genes such as TP53, STK11, PTEN, ATM and CHEK2. Despite extensive efforts to explain the missing heritability of this disease, the majority of familial clustering in breast cancer remains largely unexplained. We aim to analyze the pathology of familial cases of which no pathogenic mutation is yet identified.

      Methods

      We compared the pathological phenotype of BRCA1/BRCA2 negative familial breast cancer (BRCAx) to BRCA1-positive, BRCA2-positive and sporadic cases without a family history. Age-adjusted analysis is summarized in odd's ratios and confidence intervals for tumor type, grade, lymph node, ER and HER2 status.

      Results

      We found non-familial cases to be more likely to be ER positive (P = 0.041) as compared with BRCAx tumors. More cases of lobular carcinoma were found with BRCAx as compared to BRCA1 tumors (P = 0.05). After multivariate logistic regression analysis, BRCAx tumors are more likely ER positive (P = 0.001) and HER2 positive (P = 0.047) in comparison to BRCA1. Conversely, BRCAx cases are less likely to be ER positive (P = 0.02) but more likely to be HER2 positive (P = 0.021) as compared with BRCA2 tumors.

      Conclusion

      Our findings suggest that BRCA1, BRCA2 and BRCAx tumors differ in phenotype from non-familial and familial BRCA1-positive and BRCA2-positive tumors. Further studies will need to be performed in this important population in order to develop strategies for early detection and prevention.

      Keywords

      Abbreviations:

      BRCAx (non-BRCA1 or non-BRCA2 familial breast cancer), ER (estrogen receptor), HER2 (human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 receptor), MLPA (multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification), NCMG (Irish National Centre for Medical Genetics), CI (confidence interval), OR (Odds ratio), DCIS (ductal carcinoma in situ), IDC (invasive ductal carcinoma), ILC (invasive lobular carcinoma)
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to European Journal of Surgical Oncology
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Evans D.G.R.
        • Shenton A.
        • Woodward E.
        • Lalloo F.
        • Howell A.
        • Maher E.R.
        Penetrance estimates for BRCA1 and BRCA2 based on genetic testing in a Clinical Cancer Genetics service setting: risks of breast/ovarian cancer quoted should reflect the cancer burden in the family.
        BMC Cancer. 2008; 8: 155
        • Kriege M.
        • Brekelmans C.T.
        • Boetes C.
        • et al.
        Efficacy of MRI and mammography for breast-cancer screening in women with a familial or genetic predisposition.
        Engl J Med. 2004; 351: 427-437
        • Hartmann L.
        • Schaid D.
        • Woods J.
        • Crotty T.
        • Myers J.
        Efficacy of bilateral prophylactic mastectomy in women with a family history of breast cancer.
        Engl J Med. 1999; 340: 77-84
        • Mann G.J.
        • Thorne H.
        • Balleine R.L.
        • et al.
        Analysis of cancer risk and BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation prevalence in the kConFab familial breast cancer resource.
        Breast Cancer Res. 2006; 8: R12
        • Hall M.J.
        • Reid J.E.
        • Burbidge L.A.
        • et al.
        BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations in women of different ethnicities undergoing testing for hereditary breast-ovarian cancer.
        Cancer. 2009; 115: 2222-2233
        • Malkin D.
        • Li F.P.
        • Strong L.C.
        • et al.
        Germ line p53 mutations in a familial syndrome of breast cancer, sarcomas, and other neoplasms.
        Science. 1990; 250: 1233-1238
        • Hemminki A.
        • Markie D.
        • Tomlinson T.
        • et al.
        A serine/threonine kinase gene defective in Peutz-Jeghers syndrome.
        Nature. 1998; 114: 667-668
        • Rahman N.
        • Seal S.
        • Thompson D.
        • et al.
        PALB2, which encodes a BRCA2-interacting protein, is a breast cancer susceptibility gene.
        Nat Genet. 2007; 39: 165-167
        • Seal S.
        • Thompson D.
        • Renwick A.
        • et al.
        Truncating mutations in the Fanconi anemia J gene BRIP1 are low-penetrance breast cancer susceptibility alleles.
        Nat Genet. 2006; 38: 1239-1241
        • Nelen M.R.
        • Padberg G.W.
        • Peeters E.A.
        • et al.
        Localization of the gene for Cowden disease to chromosome 10q22-23.
        Nat Genet. 1996; 13: 114-116
        • Broeks A.
        • Urbanus J.H.
        • Floore A.N.
        • et al.
        ATM-heterozygous germline mutations contribute to breast cancer-susceptibility.
        Am J Hum Genet. 2000; 66: 494-500
        • Kainu T.
        • Juo S.H.
        • Desper R.
        • et al.
        Somatic deletions in hereditary breast cancers implicate 13q21 as a putative novel breast cancer susceptibility locus.
        PNAS. 2000; 97: 9603-9608
        • Palacios J.
        • Robles-Frias M.J.
        • Castilla M.A.
        • Lopez-Garcia M.A.
        • Benitez J.
        The molecular pathology of hereditary breast cancer.
        Pathobiology. 2008; 75: 85-94
        • Vargas A.C.
        • Reis-Filho J.S.
        • Lakhani S.R.
        Phenotype-genotype correlation in familial breast cancer.
        J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia. 2011; 16: 27-40
        • Lakhani S.
        • Gusterson B.
        The pathology of familial breast cancer: histological features of cancers in families not attributable to mutations in BRCA1 or BRCA2.
        Clin Cancer Res. 2000; 6: 782-789
        • Lakhani S.R.
        • Van De Vijver M.J.
        • Jacquemier J.
        • et al.
        The pathology of familial breast cancer: predictive value of immunohistochemical markers estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, HER-2, and p53 in patients with mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2.
        J Clin Oncol. 2002; 20: 2310-2318
        • Bane A.L.
        • Pinnaduwage D.
        • Colby S.
        • et al.
        Expression profiling of familial breast cancers demonstrates higher expression of FGFR2 in BRCA2-associated tumours.
        Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2009; 117: 183-191
        • Oldenburg R.
        • Kroeze-Jansema K.
        • Meijers-Heijboer H.
        • et al.
        Characterization of familial non-BRCA1/2 breast tumours by loss of heterozygosity and immunophenotyping.
        Clin Cancer Res. 2006; 12: 1693-1700
        • Balleine R.
        • Provan P.
        Familial concordance of breast cancer pathology as an indicator of genotype in multiple-case families.
        Genes Chromosomes Cancer. 2010; 49: 1082-1094
        • Palacios J.
        • Honrado E.
        • Osorio A.
        Immunohistochemical characteristics defined by tissue microarray of hereditary breast cancer not attributable to BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations differences from.
        Clin Cancer Res. 2003; 9: 3606-3614
        • Eccles D.M.
        • Pichert G.
        Familial non-BRCA1/BRCA2-associated breast cancer.
        Lancet Oncol. 2005; 6: 705-711
        • Da Silva L.
        • Lakhani S.R.
        Pathology of hereditary breast cancer.
        Mod Pathol. 2010; : S46-S51
        • Loughrey M.
        • Provan P.J.
        • Byth K.
        • Balleine R.L.
        Histopathological features of “BRCAX” familial breast cancers in the kConFab resource.
        Pathology. 2008; 40: 352-358
        • Eerola H.
        • Heikkilä P.
        • Tamminen A.
        • Aittomäki K.
        • Blomqvist C.
        • Nevanlinna H.
        Histopathological features of breast tumours in BRCA1, BRCA2 and mutation-negative breast cancer families.
        Breast Cancer Res. 2005; 7: R93-R100
        • Domchek S.M.
        • Friebel T.M.
        • Neuhausen S.L.
        • et al.
        Mortality after bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers: a prospective cohort study.
        Lancet Oncol. 2006; 7: 223-229
        • Meijers-Heijboer H.
        • van Geel B.
        • van Putten W.L.
        • et al.
        Breast cancer after prophylactic bilateral mastectomy in women with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation.
        N Engl J Med. 2001; 345: 159-164
        • Phillips K.A.
        • Lindeman G.J.
        Breast cancer prevention for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers: is there a role for tamoxifen?.
        Future Oncol. 2014; 10: 499-502
        • Fisher B.
        • Costantino J.P.
        • Wickerham D.L.
        • et al.
        Tamoxifen for prevention of breast cancer: report of the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project P-1 Study.
        J Natl Cancer Inst. 1998; 90: 1371-1388
        • Schechter A.
        • Stern D.
        • Vaidyanathan L.
        The neu oncogene: an erb-B-related gene encoding a 185,000-Mr tumour antigen.
        Nature. 1984; 312: 513-516
        • Fisher B.
        • Costantino J.P.
        • Wickerham D.L.
        • et al.
        Tamoxifen for prevention of breast cancer: current status of the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project P-1 Study.
        J Natl Cancer Inst. 2005; 97: 1652-1662
        • Cuzick J.
        • Sestak I.
        • Bonanni B.
        • et al.
        Selective oestrogen receptor modulators in prevention of breast cancer: an updated meta-analysis of individual participant data.
        Lancet. 2013; 381: 1827-1834
        • Metcalfe K.
        • Lynch H.T.
        • Ghadirian P.
        • et al.
        Contralateral breast cancer in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers.
        J Clin Oncol. 2004; 22: 2328-2335
        • Narod S.A.
        Hormonal prevention of hereditary breast cancer.
        Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2001; 952: 36-43
        • Cuzick J.
        • Powles T.
        • Veronesi U.
        • et al.
        Overview of the main outcomes in breast-cancer prevention trials.
        Lancet. 2003; 361: 296-300
        • Goss P.E.
        • Ingle J.N.
        • Alés-Martínez J.E.
        • et al.
        Exemestane for breast-cancer prevention in postmenopausal women.
        NEJM. 2011; 364: 2381-2391
        • Mardis E.R.
        A decade's perspective on DNA sequencing technology.
        Nature. 2011; 470: 198-203
        • Evans D.G.R.
        • Lalloo F.
        • Wallace A.
        • Rahman N.
        Update on the Manchester Scoring System for BRCA1 and BRCA2 testing.
        J Med Genet. 2005; 42: e39