Research Article| Volume 36, SUPPLEMENT 1, S50-S54, September 2010

Download started.


Enforcing centralization for gastric cancer in Denmark



      Population-based data on the early postoperative outcome after surgery for gastric cancer are very sparse. We examined the development in the quality of surgery and early postoperative outcomes in Denmark following centralization of gastric cancer surgery and implementation of national clinical guidelines.


      All patients in Denmark who underwent resection with curative intent for gastric cancer between 1st July 2003 and 31st December 2008 in one of five university hospitals were registered in a national database. Data on surgical quality and mortality were obtained from the database and compared with the results from the period before centralization (1999–2003).


      A total of 416 patients underwent resection in the study period. The risk of anastomotic leakages for the whole period was 5.0% (95%CI; 3.2–7.7) compared to 6.1% (95%CI; 4.3–8.6) before centralization, whereas the 30-days hospital mortality was 2.4% (95%CI; 1.2–4.4) compared to 8.2% (95%CI; 6.0–10.4) before centralization. In addition, the percentage of patients with at least 15 lymph nodes removed increased during the study period from 19 in 2003 to 76 in 2008.


      Centralization of gastric cancer surgery in Denmark and implementation of national clinical guidelines monitored by a national database was associated with improvements in surgical quality and substantially lower in-hospital mortality.


      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'


      Subscribe to European Journal of Surgical Oncology
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect


        • Birkmeyer J.D.
        • Stukel T.A.
        • Siewers A.E.
        • Goodney P.P.
        • Wennberg D.E.
        • Lucas F.L.
        Surgeon volume and operative mortality in the United States.
        N Engl J Med. 2003; 349: 2117-2127
        • Hannan E.L.
        • Radzyner M.
        • Rubin D.
        • Dougherty J.
        • Brennan M.F.
        The influence of hospital and surgeon volume on in-hospital mortality for colectomy, gastrectomy, and lung lobectomy in patients with cancer.
        Surgery. 2002; 131: 6-15
        • Meyer H.J.
        The influence of case load and the extent of resection on the quality of treatment outcome in gastric cancer.
        Eur J Surg Oncol. 2005; 31: 595-604
        • Skipworth R.J.E.
        • Parks R.W.
        • Stephens N.A.
        • et al.
        The relationship between hospital volume and post-operative mortality rates for upper gastrointestinal cancer resections: Scotland 1982–2003.
        Eur J Surg Oncol. 2010; 36: 141-147
        • Sasako M.
        Role of surgery in multidisciplinary treatment for solid cancers.
        Int J Clin Oncol. 2004; 9: 346-351
        • Bachmann M.O.
        • Alderson D.
        • Edwards D.
        • et al.
        Cohort study in South and West England of the influence of specialization on the management and outcome of patients with oesophageal and gastric cancers.
        Br J Surg. 2002; 89: 914-922
        • Callahan M.A.
        • Christos P.J.
        • Gold H.T.
        • Mushlin A.I.
        • Daly J.M.
        Influence of surgical subspecialty, training on in-hospital mortality for gastrectomy and colectomy patients.
        Ann Surg. 2003; 238: 629-639
        • Brennan M.F.
        • Radzyner M.
        • Rubin D.M.
        Outcome-more than just operative mortality.
        J Surg Oncol. 2009; 99: 470-477
        • Lepage C.
        • Sant M.
        • Verdecchia A.
        • Forman D.
        • Estéve J.
        • Faivre J.
        • Eurocare working group
        Operative mortality after gastric cancer resection and long-term survival differences across Europe.
        Br J Surg. 2010; 97: 235-239
        • Jensen L.S.
        • Bendixen A.
        • Kehlet H.
        Organisation and early outcomes of major upper gastrointestinal cancer surgery in Denmark 1996–2004.
        Scand J Surg. 2007; 96: 41-45
        • Sundhedsstyrelsen
        Specialeplanlægning og lands- og landsdelsfunktioner i sygehusvæsenet.
        Sundhedsstyrelsen, København2001
      1. Erichsen R, Lash TH, Hamilton-Dutoit SJ, Bjerregaard B, Vyberg M, Pedersen L. Existing data sources for clinical epidemiology: the Danish national pathology registry and data bank.

        • Andersen T.F.
        • Madsen M.
        • Jorgensen J.
        • Mellemkjoer L.
        • Olsen J.H.
        The Danish national hospital register. A valuable source of data for modern health sciences.
        Dan Med Bull. 1999; 46: 263-268
        • Pedersen C.B.
        • Gotzsche H.
        • Moller J.O.
        • Mortensen P.B.
        The Danish civil registration system. A cohort of eight million persons.
        Dan Med Bull. 2006; 53: 441-449
        • Japanese Gastric Cancer Association
        Japanese classification of gastric carcinoma; second English edition.
        Gastric Cancer. 1998; 1: 10-24
        • Volpe C.M.
        • Driscoll D.L.
        • Douglass Jr., H.O.
        Outcome of patients with proximal gastric cancer depends on extent of resection and number of resected lymph nodes.
        Ann Surg Oncol. 2000; 7: 132-144
        • Krijnen P.
        • denDulk M.
        • Kranenberg E.M.-K.
        • Jansen-Landheer M.L.E.A.
        • van de Velde C.J.H.
        Improved survival after resectable non-cardia gastric cancer in the Netherlands: the importance of surgical training and quality control.
        Eur J Surg Oncol. 2009; 35: 715-720
        • Munksgaard S.B.
        • Fischer A.
        • Rosenberg J.
        Centralization on fewer surgeons – an example from gastric surgery.
        Ugeskr Laeger. 2007; 169: 2009-2012
        • Portanova M.
        • Vargas F.
        • Lombardi E.
        • et al.
        Results of specialization in the surgical treatment of gastric cancer in Peru.
        Gastric Cancer. 2007; 10: 92-97
        • Robertson S.A.
        • Skipworth R.J.
        • Clarke D.L.
        • Crofts T.J.
        • Lee A.
        • de Beaux A.C.
        Ventilatory and intensive care requirements following oesophageal resection.
        Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2006; 88: 354-357
        • Maruyama K.
        • Sasako M.
        • Kinoshita T.
        • Sano T.
        • Katai H.
        • Okajima K.
        Pancreas preserving total gastrectomy for proximal gastric cancer.
        World J Surg. 1995; 19: 532-536
        • Faivre J.
        • Forman D.
        • Estéve J.
        • Gatta G.
        • Eurocare working group
        Survival of patients with oesophageal and gastric cancers in Europe.
        Eur J Cancer. 1998; 34: 2167-2175