European Journal of Surgical Oncology
Volume 36, Issue 8 , Pages 737-744, August 2010

Intra-operative evaluation of the sentinel lymph node for T1-N0 breast-cancer patients: Always or never? A risk/benefit and cost/benefit analysis

  • G. Canavese

      Affiliations

    • Advanced Surgical Senology Unit, National Cancer Research Institute, Genoa, Italy
  • ,
  • P. Bruzzi

      Affiliations

    • Clinical Epidemiology Unit, National Cancer Research Institute, Italy
  • ,
  • A. Catturich

      Affiliations

    • Advanced Surgical Senology Unit, National Cancer Research Institute, Genoa, Italy
  • ,
  • C. Vecchio

      Affiliations

    • Advanced Surgical Senology Unit, National Cancer Research Institute, Genoa, Italy
  • ,
  • D. Tomei

      Affiliations

    • Advanced Surgical Senology Unit, National Cancer Research Institute, Genoa, Italy
  • ,
  • F. Carli

      Affiliations

    • Anatomy and Cytohistology Unit, National Cancer Research Institute, Genoa, Italy
  • ,
  • M. Truini

      Affiliations

    • Anatomy and Cytohistology Unit, National Cancer Research Institute, Genoa, Italy
  • ,
  • G.B. Andreoli

      Affiliations

    • Institute Medical Direction, National Cancer Research Institute, Genoa, Italy
  • ,
  • V. Priano

      Affiliations

    • Advanced Surgical Senology Unit, National Cancer Research Institute, Genoa, Italy
  • ,
  • B. Dozin

      Affiliations

    • Clinical Epidemiology Unit, National Cancer Research Institute, Italy
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +39 010 5737492; fax: +39 010 354103.

Accepted 7 June 2010.

Abstract 

Aim

To investigate whether omitting intra-operative staging of the sentinel lymph node (SLN) in T1-N0 breast-cancer patients is feasible and convenient because it could allow a more efficient management of human and logistic resources without leading to an unacceptable increase in the rate of delayed axillary lymph node dissection (ALND).

Methods

According to the experimental procedure, T1a–T1b-patients were to not receive any intra-operative SLN evaluation on frozen sections (FS). In all T1c-patients, the SLN was macroscopically examined; if the node appeared clearly free of disease, no further intra-operative assessment was performed; if the node was clearly metastatic or presented a dubious aspect, the pathologist proceeded with analysis on FS. T2-patients, enrolled in the study as reference group, were treated according to the institutional standard procedure; they all received SLN staging on FS.

Results

The study included 395 T1-N0-patients. Among the 118 T1a–T1b-patients whose SLN was not analyzed at surgery, 12 (10.2%) were recalled for ALND. In the group of 258 T1c-patients, 112 received SLN analysis on FS and 146 did not. An SLN falsely negative either at macroscopic or FS examination was found in 33 (12.8%) cases. Overall, the rate of recall for ALND was 11.6% as compared to 8.4% in T2-patients. Using the experimental protocol, the institution reached a 9.6% cost saving, as compared to the standard procedure.

Conclusions

Omission of SLN intra-operative staging in T1-N0-patients is rather safe. It provides the institution with both management and economical advantages.

Keywords: Breast-cancer, Sentinel lymph node, Intra-operative evaluation, Axillary lymph node dissection

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0748-7983(10)00186-1

doi:10.1016/j.ejso.2010.06.010

European Journal of Surgical Oncology
Volume 36, Issue 8 , Pages 737-744, August 2010