European Journal of Surgical Oncology
Volume 36, Issue 8 , Pages 772-776, August 2010

Clinical utility of elevated tumor markers in patients with disseminated appendiceal malignancies treated by cytoreductive surgery and HIPEC

  • A. Ross

      Affiliations

    • Division of Surgery, Department of Surgical Oncology, The Institute for Cancer Care, Mercy Medical Center, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
  • ,
  • A. Sardi

      Affiliations

    • Division of Surgery, Department of Surgical Oncology, The Institute for Cancer Care, Mercy Medical Center, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
  • ,
  • C. Nieroda

      Affiliations

    • Division of Surgery, Department of Surgical Oncology, The Institute for Cancer Care, Mercy Medical Center, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
  • ,
  • B. Merriman

      Affiliations

    • Asthma and Allergy Center, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
  • ,
  • V. Gushchin

      Affiliations

    • Division of Surgery, Department of Surgical Oncology, The Institute for Cancer Care, Mercy Medical Center, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author at: Institute for Cancer Care, Mercy Medical Center, 227 St. Paul Place, 4th Floor Weinberg Building, Baltimore, MD 21202, USA. Tel.: +1 410 332 9294.

Accepted 17 May 2010.

Abstract 

Background

Appendiceal malignancies with peritoneal spread have been successfully treated with Cytoreductive Surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC). The aim of this study is to clarify the utility of common tumor markers in selecting patients for the combined treatment.

Methods

Data on 56 patients with appendiceal neoplasms treated with CRS and HIPEC were prospectively collected. Chi square test was used to analyze a link between common tumor markers and completeness of cytoreduction score (CC score) and preoperative peritoneal cancer index score (PCI score). Cox proportional hazard model was used to perform survival analysis.

Results

Forty-two patients were alive after 3 years of follow-up. Hazard ratio of disease related death was 5.6 (95% CI, 1.8–17.2) among patients with high CC score as compared to those with low CC score. Number of abnormal tumor markers (0 vs 1/2/3) correlated with PCI score 16.2 vs 32.5 (p < 0.001) but not with completeness of cytoreduction or survival. The 3-year survival rates in patients with normal vs abnormal CA 125 levels were 83% vs 52%(p = 0.003).

Conclusions

Multiple abnormal tumor markers were not useful as an exclusion criterion for patients undergoing CRS. Elevation in CA 125 was an important indicator of survival in these patients. Complete cytoreduction was crucial for long-term survival.

Keywords: Appendiceal malignancy, Cytoreductive surgery, HIPEC, Tumor markers

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0748-7983(10)00132-0

doi:10.1016/j.ejso.2010.05.024

European Journal of Surgical Oncology
Volume 36, Issue 8 , Pages 772-776, August 2010