« Previous
Next »
European Journal of Surgical Oncology
Volume 36, Issue 7
, Pages 639-645
, July 2010
The impact of young age on breast cancer outcome
References
- Cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin. 2006;56:106–130
- Epirubicin/vinorelbine adjuvant chemotherapy in young women with breast cancer is associated with preservation of menstrual function. Clin Oncol. 2008;20:513–516
- Annual report to the nation on the status of cancer, 1975–2005, featuring trends in lung cancer, tobacco use, and tobacco control. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2008;100:1672–1694
- Breast cancer in young women and its impact on reproductive function. Hum Reprod Update. 2009;15:323–339
- Adjuvant systemic therapy and survival after breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 1994;330:805
- . Breast cancer in young women: climbing for progress in care and knowledge. Womens Health. 2006;2:717–732
- Is chemotherapy alone adequate for young women with oestrogen-receptor-positive breast cancer?. Lancet. 2000;355:1869–1874
- . The relationship between prognostic and predictive factors in the management of breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 1998;52:261
- . How young is too young? The impact of age on premenopausal breast cancer prognosis. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2002;76:A137
- Young age at diagnosis correlates with worse prognosis and defines a subset of breast cancers with shared patterns of gene expression. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:3324–3330
- . Basal-like breast cancer: a critical review. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:2568–2581
- Impact of young age on outcome in patients with ductal carcinoma-in-situ treated with breast-conserving therapy. J Clin Oncol. 2000;18:296–306
- . Systemic treatment of early breast cancer by hormonal, cytotoxic or immune therapy: 133 randomized trials involving 31,000 recurrences and 24,000 deaths among 75,000 women. Lancet. 1992;339:71–85
- . Polychemotherapy for early breast cancer: an overview of the randomised trials. Lancet. 1998;19:930–942
- Two months of doxorubicin–cyclophosphamide with and without interval reinduction therapy compared with 6 months of cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil in positive-node breast cancer patients with tamoxifen-nonresponsive tumors: results from the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project B-15. J Clin Oncol. 1990;8:1483–1496
- Randomized trial of intensive cyclophosphamide, epirubicin, and fluorouracil chemotherapy compared with cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil in premenopausal women with node-positive breast cancer. National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group. J Clin Oncol. 1998;16:2651–2658
- Randomized, controlled trial of cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil versus cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and fluorouracil with and without tamoxifen for high-risk, node-negative breast cancer: treatment results of Intergroup Protocol INT-0102. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23:8313–8321
- Adjuvant chemotherapy in oestrogen-receptor-poor breast cancer: patient-level meta-analysis of randomised trials. Lancet. 2008;371:29–40
- Is anthracycline-based chemotherapy alone adequate for young women with estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer?. Breast. 2006;15:269–272
- Improved outcome from adding sequential paclitaxel but not escalating doxorubicin dose in an adjuvant chemotherapy regimen for patients with node positive primary breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2003;21:976–983
- Weekly paclitaxel in the adjuvant treatment of breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2008;358:1663–1671
- . Effects of chemotherapy and hormonal therapy for early breast cancer on recurrence and 15-year survival: an overview of the randomised trials. Lancet. 2005;365:1687–1717
- . Tamoxifen after adjuvant chemotherapy for premenopausal women with lymph node-positive breast cancer: International Breast Cancer Study Group Trial 13–93. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24:1332–1341
- High local recurrence risk is not associated with large survival reduction after postmastectomy radiotherapy in high-risk breast cancer: a subgroup analysis of DBCG 82 b&c. Radiother Oncol. 2009;90:74–79
PII: S0748-7983(10)00124-1
doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2010.05.016
© 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
« Previous
Next »
European Journal of Surgical Oncology
Volume 36, Issue 7
, Pages 639-645
, July 2010
