European Journal of Surgical Oncology
Volume 36, Issue 4 , Pages 371-377, April 2010

Replacement of the proximal humerus with MUTARS tumor endoprostheses

  • P. Raiss

      Affiliations

    • Division of Orthopaedic Oncology, Department of Orthopaedics, University of Heidelberg, Schlierbacher Landstrasse 200 A, 69118 Heidelberg, Germany
  • ,
  • S. Kinkel

      Affiliations

    • Division of Orthopaedic Oncology, Department of Orthopaedics, University of Heidelberg, Schlierbacher Landstrasse 200 A, 69118 Heidelberg, Germany
  • ,
  • U. Sauter

      Affiliations

    • Division of Orthopaedic Oncology, Department of Orthopaedics, University of Heidelberg, Schlierbacher Landstrasse 200 A, 69118 Heidelberg, Germany
  • ,
  • T. Bruckner

      Affiliations

    • Division of Orthopaedic Oncology, Department of Orthopaedics, University of Heidelberg, Schlierbacher Landstrasse 200 A, 69118 Heidelberg, Germany
    • Institute for Medical Biometrics and Informatics, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 305, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Orthopädische Universitätsklinik Heidelberg, Schlierbacher Landstrasse 200 A, 69118 Heidelberg, Germany. Tel.: +49 6221 966360; fax: +49 6221 966311.
  • ,
  • B. Lehner

      Affiliations

    • Division of Orthopaedic Oncology, Department of Orthopaedics, University of Heidelberg, Schlierbacher Landstrasse 200 A, 69118 Heidelberg, Germany

Accepted 2 November 2009.

Abstract 

Background and objectives

The aim of this study was to analyze our results using a modular endoprosthetic replacement system (MUTARS) for bone tumors of the proximal humerus.

Methods

Thirty-nine patients were treated with a MUTARS endoprosthesis of the proximal humerus. Mean follow-up duration was 38 months (3–138 months). Most operations were necessitated by metastasis (n=30); surgery for a primary tumor (n=9) was less frequent. The Enneking score was recorded and the active ranges of motion for shoulder flexion, abduction, and external rotation. Complete refixation of the rotator cuff was possible in 23 cases. Radiographs of the affected shoulders were obtained in two planes.

Results

Patient survival was 77% at 2 years and 45% at 11.5 years after surgery. The survival rate of the limb was 90% at 11.5 years. The mean Enneking score was 19 points (range 7–27 points). The mean shoulder flexion was 34° (range 0–90°), abduction 33° (range 0–90°), and external rotation 12° (range 10–50°). Patients with a complete rotator cuff repair showed a significant better range of motion compared to patients with a partial or no repair (p<0.015). No signs of implant loosening were observed on postoperative radiographs. Seven complications occurred, five of them leading to implant revision. At 11.5 years after surgery, the survival rate for the whole cohort without complications was 72%, without revision of the implant 70%.

Conclusions

Replacement of the proximal humerus with MUTARS endoprosthesis is a viable treatment option for bone tumors with satisfying results.

Keywords: Arthroplasty, Humerus, Defect reconstruction, Limb salvage, Megaprosthesis, MUTARS

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0748-7983(09)00503-4

doi:10.1016/j.ejso.2009.11.001

European Journal of Surgical Oncology
Volume 36, Issue 4 , Pages 371-377, April 2010