European Journal of Surgical Oncology
Volume 36, Issue 3 , Pages 287-291 , March 2010

Effects on renal function of obstructive and nonobstructive dilatation of the upper urinary tract in ileal neobladders with refluxing ureteroenteric anastomoses

  • R. Minervini

      Affiliations

    • Department of Surgery, Urology Unit, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
  • ,
  • R. Pagni

      Affiliations

    • Department of Surgery, Urology Unit, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
  • ,
  • C. Mariani

      Affiliations

    • Department of Surgery, Urology Unit, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
  • ,
  • A. Morelli

      Affiliations

    • Department of Surgery, Urology Unit, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
  • ,
  • G. Morelli

      Affiliations

    • Department of Surgery, Urology Unit, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
  • ,
  • A. Minervini

      Affiliations

    • Clinica Urologica I, Azienda Ospedaliera Careggi, Università di Firenze, Villa Monna Tessa, Viale Pieraccini 18, 50139, Firenze, Italy
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +39 055 417645; fax: +39 055 4377755.

,Accepted 10 September 2009.

References 

  1. Oosterlinck W, Lobel B, Jakse G. Guidelines on bladder cancer. Eur Urol. 2002;41(2):105–112
  2. Porter MP, Penson DF. Health related quality of life after radical cistectomy and urinary diversion for bladder cancer: a systematic review and critical analysis of literature. J Urol. 2005;173:1318–1322
  3. Porter MP, Wei JT, Penson DF. Quality of life issues in bladder cancer patients following cystectomy and urinary diversion. Urol Clin North Am. 2005;32:207–216
  4. Gerharz Elmar W. Is there any evidence that one continent diversion is any better than any other or than ileal conduit?. Curr Opin Urol. 2007;17:402–407
  5. Hautmann RE. Urinary diversion: ileal conduit to neobladder. J Urol. 2003;169:834–842
  6. Studer UE, Burkhard FC, Schumacher M, et al. Twenty years experience with an ileal orthotopic low pressure bladder substitute-lesson to be learned. J Urol. 2006;176:161–166
  7. Minervini A, Boni G, Salinitri G, et al. Evaluation of renal function and upper urinary tract morphology in the ileal orthotopic neobladder with no antireflux mechanism. J Urol. 2005;173:144–147
  8. Wood DP, Bianco FJ, Pontes JE, et al. Incidence and significance of positive urine cultures in patients with an orthotopic neobladder. J Urol. 2003;169:2196–2199
  9. Okur H, Köse O, Kula M, et al. The role of infection and free oxygen radical damage in reflux nephropathy: an experimental study. J Urol. 2003;169:1874–1877
  10. Ransley PG, Risdon RA. Reflux and renal scarring. Br J Radiol. 1978;14(1):45–54
  11. Stein JP, Freeman JA, Esrig D, et al. Complications of the afferent antireflux valve mechanism in the Koch ileal reservoir. J Urol. 1996;155:1579–1584
  12. Pantuck AJ, Han K-R, Perrotti M, Weiss RE, et al. Ureteroenteric anastomosis in continent urinary diversion: long-term results and complications of direct versus nonrefluxing techniques. J Urol. 2000;163:450–455
  13. Ayman AH, Samir AE, Magdy AS, et al. Evaluation of direct versus non refluxing technique and functional results in orthotopic Y ileal neobladder after 12 years after follow up. Int J Urol. 2007;14:300–304
  14. Kock NG, Nilson AE, Nilsson LO, et al. Urinary diversion via a continent ileal reservoir: clinical results in 12 patient. J Urol. 1982;128:469–475
  15. Le Duc A, Camay M, Teillac P. An original antireflux ureteroileal implantation technique. Long term follow up. J Urol. 1987;137:1156–1158
  16. Sagalowsky AI. Early results with split-cuff nipple ureteral reimplants in urinary diversion. J Urol. 1995;154:2028–2031
  17. Abol-Enein H, Ghoneim MA. A novel uretero-ileal reimplantation technique: the serous lined extramural tunnel. A preliminary report. J Urol. 1994;151:1193–1194
  18. Stein JP, Lieskovsky G, Ginsberg DA, et al. The T-pouch: an orthotopic ileal neobladder incorporating a serosal lined ileal antireflux technique. J Urol. 1998;159:1836–1842
  19. Studer UE, Danuser M, Springer JP, et al. Experience in 100 patients an ileal low pressure bladder substitute combined with an afferent tubular isoperistaltic segment. J Urol. 1995;154:49–56
  20. Minervini R, Morelli G, Fontana N, et al. Functional evaluation of different ileal neobladders and ureteral reimplantation techniques. Eur Urol. 1998;34:198–202
  21. Mulligan JS, Blue PW, Hasbargen JA. Methods for measuring GFR with technetium-99m-DTPA: an analysis of several common methods. J Nucl Med. 1990;31:1211–1219
  22. Inoue Y, Ohtake T, Homma Y, et al. Evaluation of glomerular filtration rate by camera-based method in both children and adults. J Nucl Med. 1998;39:1784–1788
  23. Skinner EC, Skinner DG. Does reflux in orthotopic diversion matter? A randomized prospective comparison of the Studer and T-pouch ileal neobladders. World J Urol. 2009;27:51–55
  24. Yang WJ, Cho KS, Rha KH, et al. Long term effects of ileal conduit urinary diversion on upper urinary tract in bladder cancer. Urology. 2006;68(2):324–327
  25. Burkhard FC, Kessler TM, Mills R, et al. Continent urinary diversion. Critical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology. 2006;57:255–264
  26. Roth S, Van Ahlen H, Semjonow A, et al. Does the success of ureterointestinal implantation in orthotopic bladder substitution depend more on surgeon level of experience or choice of technique?. J Urol. 1997;157:56–60
  27. Studer UE, Zingg EJ. Ileal orthotopic bladder substitutes. What we have learned from 12 years' experience with 200 patients. Urol Clin North Am. 1997;24:781–793
  28. Osman Y, Abol-Enein H, Nabeeh A, et al. Long-term results of a prospective randomized study comparing two different antireflux techniques in orthotopic bladder substitution. Eur Urol. 2004;45:82–86
  29. Kramolowsky EV, Clayman RV, Weyman PJ. Management of ureterointestinal anastomotic strictures: comparison of open surgical and endourological repair. J Urol. 1988;139(6):1195–1198
  30. Hautmann RE, Abol-enein H, Afez K, et al. Urinary diversion. Urology. 2007;69(1A):17–49

PII: S0748-7983(09)00464-8

doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2009.09.003

European Journal of Surgical Oncology
Volume 36, Issue 3 , Pages 287-291 , March 2010