European Journal of Surgical Oncology
Volume 36, Issue 2 , Pages 170-175 , February 2010

Histology after lumpectomy in women with epithelial atypia on stereotactic vacuum-assisted breast biopsy

  • O. Graesslin

      Affiliations

    • Centre Hospitalier Universitaire, Institut Mère Enfant Alix de Champagne, Service de Gynécologie, F-51092 Reims, France
    • UPRES EA 2396 UFR Saint-Antoine, Université Pierre et Marie Curie, Paris VI, F-75006 Paris, France
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author at: Service de Gynécologie-Obstétrique, Institut Mère Enfant Alix de Champagne, 45 rue Cognacq-Jay, 51092 Reims Cedex, France. Tel.: +33 3 26 78 3517; fax: +33 3 26 78 38 39.
    • ,
  • M. Antoine

      Affiliations

    • Service d'Anatomie Pathologique, Hôpital Tenon, AP-HP, F-75020 Paris, France
    • ,
  • J. Chopier

      Affiliations

    • Service de Radiologie, Hôpital Tenon, AP-HP, F-75020 Paris, France
    • ,
  • J.Y. Seror

      Affiliations

    • Service de Radiologie, Hôpital Tenon, AP-HP, F-75020 Paris, France
    • Centre de radiologie Duroc, Boulevard Montparnasse, F-75014 Paris, France
    • ,
  • A. Flahault

      Affiliations

    • Département de biostatistiques, Hôpital Tenon, AP-HP, F-75020 Paris, France
    • ,
  • P. Callard

      Affiliations

    • Service d'Anatomie Pathologique, Hôpital Tenon, AP-HP, F-75020 Paris, France
    • ,
  • E. Daraï

      Affiliations

    • UPRES EA 2396 UFR Saint-Antoine, Université Pierre et Marie Curie, Paris VI, F-75006 Paris, France
    • Service de Gynécologie, Hôpital Tenon, AP-HP, F-75020 Paris, France
    • ,
  • S. Uzan

      Affiliations

    • UPRES EA 2396 UFR Saint-Antoine, Université Pierre et Marie Curie, Paris VI, F-75006 Paris, France
    • Service de Gynécologie, Hôpital Tenon, AP-HP, F-75020 Paris, France

,Accepted 10 September 2009.

References 

  1. Jackman RJ, Nowels KW, Rodriguez-Soto J, et al. Stereotactic, automated, large-core needle biopsy of nonpalpable breast lesions: false-negative and histologic underestimation rates after long-term follow-up. Radiology. 1999;210:799–805
  2. Dahlstrom JE, Sutton S, Jain S. Histological precision of stereotactic core biopsy in diagnosis of malignant and premalignant breast lesions. Histopathology. 1996;28:537–541
  3. Darling ML, Smith DN, Lester SC, et al. Atypical ductal hyperplasia and ductal carcinoma in situ as revealed by large core needle breast biopsy: results of surgical excision. Am J Roentgenol. 2000;175:1341–1346
  4. Moore MM, Hargett CW, Hanks JB, et al. Association of breast cancer with the finding of atypical ductal hyperplasia at core breast biopsy. Ann Surg. 1997;225:726–731
  5. Tavassoli FA. Ductal intraepithelial neoplasia of the breast. Virchows Arch. 2001;438:221–227
  6. Van de Vijver M, Peterse H. The diagnosis and management of preinvasive breast disease. Pathological diagnosis – problems with existing classifications. Breast Cancer Res. 2003;5:p. 269–75
  7. Page DL, Rogers LW. Combined histologic and cytologic criteria for the diagnosis of mammary atypical ductal hyperplasia. Hum Pathol. 1992;23:1095–1097
  8. Tavassoli FA, Norris HJ. A comparison of the results of long-term follow-up for atypical intraductal hyperplasia and intraductal hyperplasia of the breast. Cancer. 1990;65:518–529
  9. Schnitt SJ, Vincent-Salomon A. Columnar cell lesions of the breast. Adv Anat Pathol. 2003;10:113–124
  10. Ely KA, Carter BA, Jensen RA, et al. Core biopsy of the breast with atypical ductal hyperplasia. Am J Surg Pathol. 2001;25:1017–1021
  11. Bedei L, Falcini F, Sanna PA, et al. Atypical ductal hyperplasia of the breast: the controversial management of a borderline lesion: experience of 47 cases diagnosed at vacuum-assisted biopsy. Breast. 2006;15:196–202
  12. Adrales G, Turk P, Wallace T, et al. Is surgical excision necessary for atypical ductal hyperplasia of the breast diagnosed by mammotome?. Am J Surg Pathol. 2000;180:313–315
  13. Hartmann L, Sellers T, Frost M, et al. Benign breast disease and the risk of breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2005;353:229–237
  14. Arpino G, Laucirica R, Elledge RM. Premalignant and in situ breast disease: biology and clinical implications. Ann Intern Med. 2005;143:446–457
  15. Tavassoli FA, Boeckler W, Lakhani SR. Lobular neoplasia. World Health Organization classification of tumours. Pathology and genetics of the breast and female genital organs. Lyon: IARC Press; 2003;
  16. Ioffe OB, Berg WA, Silverberg SG, et al. Mammographic-histopathologic correlation of large-core needle biopsies of the breast. Mod Pathol. 1998;11:721–727
  17. Liberman L, Kaplan J, Morris E, et al. To excise or to sample the mammographic target: what is the goal of stereotactic 11-gauge vacuum-assisted breast biopsy?. Am J Roentgenol. 2002;179:679–683
  18. Lomoshitz FM, Helbich TH, Rudas M, et al. Stereotactic 11-gauge vacuum-assisted breast biopsy: influence of number of specimens on diagnostic accuracy. Radiology. 2004;232:897–903
  19. Jackman RJ, Birdwell RL, Ikeda DM. Atypical ductal hyperplasia: can some lesions be defined as probably benign after stereotactic 11-gauge vacuum-assisted biopsy, eliminating the recommendation for surgical excision?. Radiology. 2002;224:799–805
  20. Liberman L, Smolkin JH, Dershaw DD, et al. Calcification retrieval at 11-gauge, stereotactic, directional, vacuum-assisted breast biopsy. Radiology. 1998;208:251–260
  21. Cangiarella J, Waisman J, Symmans WF, et al. Mammotome core biopsy for mammary microcalcification. Analysis of 160 biopsies from 142 women with surgical and radiological follow-up. Cancer. 2001;91:173–177
  22. Kettritz U, Rotter K, Schreer I, et al. Stereotatic vacuum-assisted breast biopsy in 2874 patients. Cancer. 2004;100:245–251
  23. Philpotts LE, Shaheen NA, Carter D, et al. Comparison of rebiopsy rates after stereotactic core needle biopsy of the breast with 11-gauge vacuum suction probe versus 14-gauge needle and automatic gun. Am J Roentgenol. 1999;172:683–687
  24. Lacroix-Triki M, Mery E, Voigt JJ, et al. Value of cytokeratin 5/6 immunostaining using D5/16 B4 antibody in the spectrum of proliferative intraepithelial lesions of the breast. A comparative study with 34betaE12 antibody. Virchows Arch. 2003;442:548–554
  25. Burak WE, Owens K, Tighe M, et al. Vacuum-assisted stereotatic breast biopsy. Arch Surg. 2000;135:700–703
  26. Page DL, Schuyler PA, Dupont WD, et al. Atypical lobular hyperplasia as a unilateral predictor of breast cancer risk: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet. 2003;361:125–129
  27. Collins LC, Baer HJ, Tamimi RM, et al. Magnitude and laterality of breast cancer risk according to histologic type of atypical hyperplasia. Results from the Nurses' Health Study. Cancer. 2007;109:180–187
  28. Liberman L, Sama M, Susnik B, et al. Lobular carcinoma in situ at breast biopsy: surgical biopsy findings. Am J Roentgenol. 1999;173:291–299
  29. Middleton LP, Grant S, Stephens T, et al. Lobular carcinoma in situ diagnosed by core needle biopsy: when should it be excised?. Mod Pathol. 2003;16:120–129
  30. Shah VI, Raju U, Chitale D, et al. False-negative core needle biopsies of the breast. Cancer. 2003;97:1824–1831

PII: S0748-7983(09)00463-6

doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2009.09.002

European Journal of Surgical Oncology
Volume 36, Issue 2 , Pages 170-175 , February 2010

Article Tools