European Journal of Surgical Oncology
Volume 35, Issue 10 , Pages 1041-1047, October 2009

A pilot study of dual-isotope lymphoscintigraphy for breast sentinel node biopsy comparing intradermal and intraparenchymal injection

  • J.C. Fowler

      Affiliations

    • Departments of Nuclear Medicine, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK
    • Department of Radiology Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK
    • Department of Radiology, Luton and Dunstable Hospital, Luton, UK
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Luton and Dunstable NHS Trust, Lewsey Road, Luton, LU4 0DZ, UK.
  • ,
  • C.K. Solanki

      Affiliations

    • Departments of Nuclear Medicine, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK
  • ,
  • I. Guenther

      Affiliations

    • Departments of Nuclear Medicine, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK
  • ,
  • R. Barber

      Affiliations

    • Departments of Nuclear Medicine, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK
  • ,
  • F. Miller

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiology Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK
  • ,
  • L. Bobrow

      Affiliations

    • Histopathology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK
  • ,
  • D. Ravichandran

      Affiliations

    • Department of Surgery, Luton and Dunstable Hospital, Luton, UK
  • ,
  • D. Lawrence

      Affiliations

    • Department of Pathology, Luton and Dunstable Hospital, Luton, UK
  • ,
  • J.R. Ballinger

      Affiliations

    • Departments of Nuclear Medicine, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK
    • Currently at: King's College London/Guy's and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, UK.
  • ,
  • A. Douglas-Jones

      Affiliations

    • Department of Histopathology, University of Wales College of Medicine, UK
  • ,
  • A.D. Purushotham

      Affiliations

    • Cambridge Breast Unit, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK
    • Currently at: King's College London/Guy's and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, UK.
  • ,
  • A.M. Peters

      Affiliations

    • Departments of Nuclear Medicine, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK
    • Currently at: Brighton Sussex Medical School, UK.

Accepted 24 February 2009.

Abstract 

Aims

Identification of sentinel lymph nodes (SLN) may depend on the tissue plane of tracer injection. To explore this, we developed a dual-isotope technique to compare the lymphatic drainage basins accessed by intradermal and parenchymal injections.

Methods

Fifteen breast cancer patients had simultaneous parenchymal and intradermal injections of 99mTc-labelled human immunoglobulin G (HIG) and 111In-HIG, respectively, 2–4h before axillary lymph node clearance surgery. All 228 freshly dissected nodes were assayed by well counting and examined for metastatic disease by haematoxylin/eosin staining and immuno-histochemistry.

Results

Total nodal uptake following intradermal injection was 10 times more than after parenchymal injection. Tracer uptake within the first three draining nodes divided patients into three groups; four (group 1) had identical 1st, 2nd and 3rd echelon nodes, six (group 2) had identical 1st and 2nd echelon nodes and five (group 3) had different 1st echelon nodes. With respect to the first, second and third groups, there was close, moderate and poor correlation (Pearson), respectively, between individual nodal counts accumulated from the two injection sites. Of eight patients with nodal disease, the SLN identified by intradermal and parenchymal injections contained disease in seven and four patients, respectively.

Conclusions

Comparison of nodal tracer distributions from the two injection planes allows a functional model to be developed with two possible routes of drainage from the parenchymal plane, one joining the tract from the areolar plexus and the other passing independently to the axilla which builds upon Sappey's original anatomical model. This may explain the variable uptake, discordance and false negative SLN identification.

Keywords: Lymphoscintigraphy, Sentinel, Injection plane, Breast carcinoma

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0748-7983(09)00075-4

doi:10.1016/j.ejso.2009.02.018

European Journal of Surgical Oncology
Volume 35, Issue 10 , Pages 1041-1047, October 2009