European Journal of Surgical Oncology
Volume 35, Issue 11 , Pages 1137-1145, November 2009

The role of PET in the surgical approach to adrenal disease

  • M.D. Gross

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiology, Division of Nuclear Medicine, University of Michigan Medical Center and Department of Veterans Affairs Health System, Ann Arbor, Michigan USA
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Milton D Gross M.D., Chief, Nuclear Medicine Service (115), Department of Veterans Affairs Health System, 2215 Fuller Rd, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48105, USA. Tel.: +1 734 845 3082; fax: +1 734 845 3278.
  • ,
  • P.G. Gauger

      Affiliations

    • Department of Surgery, Division of Endocrine Surgery, University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor, Michigan USA
  • ,
  • M. Djekidel

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiology, Division of Nuclear Medicine, University of Michigan Medical Center and Department of Veterans Affairs Health System, Ann Arbor, Michigan USA
  • ,
  • D. Rubello

      Affiliations

    • Department of Nuclear Medicine, PET Center, ‘Santa Maria della Misericordia’ Hospital, Rovigo, Italy
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Domenico Rubello M.D., Chief, Nuclear Medicine Service, PET Center, Director, Department of Radiology, Medical Physics and Nuclear Medicine, Santa Maria della Misericordia Hospital, Viale Tre Martiri 140, 45100 Rovigo, Italy. Tel.: +39 39 4431; fax: +39 39 4427.

Accepted 23 January 2009.

Abstract 

Background

Appropriate surgical approach to diseases of the adrenal requires a diagnosis sufficient to determine the biochemical status of adrenal dysfunction and anatomic evaluation sufficient to differentiate unilateral from bilateral disease, intra-adrenal from extra-adrenal neoplasm, adrenal tumor recurrence or adrenal metastases. High resolution computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance have been the primary imaging modalities for the evaluation of anatomy, while scintigraphic studies have played a secondary role in diagnosis. The recent availability of functional imaging provided by positron emission tomography (PET) with radiopharmaceuticals designed to depict substrate precursor uptake, cellular metabolism or receptor binding in neoplasms and CT as a single modality, hybrid PET/CT, to directly correlate function and anatomy has had a significant impact upon the diagnostic and therapeutic approach to many cancers and has been applied to adrenal disease with some early success that we describe in this review.

Methods

In addition to the authors' experience, a search of Medline and PubMed databases was performed using search terms: ‘adrenal scintigraphy’, ‘positron tomography’, ‘computed tomography’, ‘adrenal surgery’, ‘adrenal mass’, ‘18F-fluorodeoxyglucose’, ‘adrenal carcinoma’, ‘adrenal medulla’ and ‘pheochromocytoma’.

Conclusions

Present PET radiopharmaceuticals and their use in hybrid PET/CT have demonstrated efficacy in the preoperative and follow-up evaluation of neoplasms of the adrenal cortex and medulla that hopefully will continue to improve with the development of newer tracers that continue to exploit unusual characteristics of the adrenals.

Keywords: Adrenal scintigraphy, Positron emission tomography (PET), Computed tomography (CT), adrenal surgery, 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG), Adrenal carcinoma, Pheochromocytoma

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0748-7983(09)00030-4

doi:10.1016/j.ejso.2009.01.010

European Journal of Surgical Oncology
Volume 35, Issue 11 , Pages 1137-1145, November 2009