European Journal of Surgical Oncology
Volume 35, Issue 1 , Pages 59-64, January 2009

A new measure to assess the difficulty of liver resection

  • S. Beller

      Affiliations

    • Surgical Research Unit OP 2000, Campus Berlin Buch, Charitè Universitätsmedizin, Berlin, Germany
  • ,
  • S. Eulenstein

      Affiliations

    • Surgical Research Unit OP 2000, Campus Berlin Buch, Charitè Universitätsmedizin, Berlin, Germany
  • ,
  • T. Lange

      Affiliations

    • Surgical Research Unit OP 2000, Campus Berlin Buch, Charitè Universitätsmedizin, Berlin, Germany
  • ,
  • M. Niederstrasser

      Affiliations

    • Surgical Research Unit OP 2000, Campus Berlin Buch, Charitè Universitätsmedizin, Berlin, Germany
  • ,
  • M. Hünerbein

      Affiliations

    • Klinik für Chirurgie und Chirurgische Onkologie, Robert-Rössle Klinik, Berlin-Buch, Berlin, Germany
  • ,
  • P.M. Schlag

      Affiliations

    • Klinik für Chirurgie und Chirurgische Onkologie, Robert-Rössle Klinik, Berlin-Buch, Berlin, Germany
    • Charitè Comprehensive Cancer Center, Charitè Campus Mitte, Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Invalidenstrasse 80, 10117 Berlin, Germany
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Charitè Comprehensive Cancer Center, Charitè Campus Mitte, Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Invalidenstrasse 80, 10117 Berlin, Germany. Tel.: +49 30 450564622.

Accepted 24 July 2008.

Abstract 

Background

There is no valid measure to assess surgical difficulty and feasibility of a planned liver resection. It is the objective of this study to evaluate a mathematical measure from a 3D graphical analysis.

Methods

Eleven different 3D models of hepatic tumours were evaluated by experts for resectability and analysed with Amira® graphic software taking into consideration the portal and hepatic venous vascular relationships. Virtual resection volumes with increasing resection margins from 1 to 30mm were determined separately for portal veins, hepatic veins, their intersections and volume unions. The integral of the increasing resection volumes was defined as risk coefficient. The risk coefficients from this volumetric analysis were compared with the expert opinion.

Results

The risk coefficient based on the integral of portal venous and hepatic venous volume unions reproduced the expert opinion highly significantly (correlation coefficient 0.9, p<0.05) and more accurately than volumetric analysis of the planned resection margin.

Conclusion

With automated volumetric analysis, anatomically problematic situations in liver surgery can be reproduced and scaled. The risk coefficient obtained is a suitable objective measure for defining risk areas in liver surgery.

Keywords: Liver, Surgery, Risk, 3D, Volumetry

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0748-7983(08)01729-0

doi:10.1016/j.ejso.2008.07.014

European Journal of Surgical Oncology
Volume 35, Issue 1 , Pages 59-64, January 2009