Touch imprint cytology with cytokeratin immunostaining versus Papanicolau staining for intraoperative evaluation of sentinel lymph node metastasis in clinically node-negative breast cancer

Abstract 

Aim

This study investigated whether intraoperative assessment of SLN status in patients with clinically node-negative breast cancer was improved using touch imprint immunohistochemistry.

Material and methods

Each SLN was cut into slices 2mm thick and evaluated intraoperatively by touch imprint cytology with Papanicolaou staining until the end of 2005, or by a combination of Papanicolaou staining and immunostaining with an anti-cytokeratin antibody from early 2006.

Results

When intraoperative cytology of SLN in 85 patients who were clinically node-negative was evaluated with Papanicolaou staining, 81 patients were diagnosed as negative and four were positive. Intraoperative cytology with Papanicolaou staining had a sensitivity of 30%, specificity of 99%, false-negative rate of 70%, false-positive rate of 1.3%, and accuracy of 90.6%. When intraoperative cytology was done with immunohistochemistry plus Papanicolaou staining for SLN evaluation, 92 patients were diagnosed as negative and 17 patients were positive. Intraoperative cytology with immunohistochemistry had a sensitivity of 79%, specificity of 98%, false-negative rate of 21%, false-positive rate of 2.2%, and accuracy of 94.5%. Compared with intraoperative cytology using Papanicolaou staining alone, the combination of immunohistochemistry and Papanicolaou staining achieved a significant increase in sensitivity and a significant decrease in the false-negative rate.

Conclusion

Intraoperative SLN evaluation by imprint cytology with immunohistochemistry achieves a more accurate diagnosis of metastasis than imprint cytology alone. This combined method is considered useful for deciding whether to perform axillary lymph node dissection.

Keywords: Immunohistochemistry, Imprint cytology, Sentinel lymph node, Breast cancer