European Journal of Surgical Oncology
Volume 35, Issue 4 , Pages 362-367, April 2009

Results of primary versus salvage surgery in carcinoma of the buccal mucosa

  • M. Pandey

      Affiliations

    • Department of Surgical Oncology, Institute of Medical Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, UP 221005, India
    • Department of Surgical Oncology, Regional Cancer Centre, Trivandrum, Kerala, India
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Department of Surgical Oncology, Institute of Medical Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, UP 221005, India. Tel.: +91 542 2309511; fax: +91 542 2366014.
  • ,
  • R. Bindu

      Affiliations

    • Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Government Dental College, Trivandrum, Kerala, India
  • ,
  • C.S. Soumithran

      Affiliations

    • Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Government Dental College, Trivandrum, Kerala, India

Accepted 18 February 2008.

Abstract 

Background

Of the oral cancer subsites, carcinoma of the buccal mucosa is commonest. Tumor size, tumor stage, nodal status, grade of tumor, performance status, site of primary, thickness, depth of invasion, tumor margin, etc. are reported to be predictors of survival.

Patients and methods

A total of 142 patients treated with surgery were retrospectively studied. Patients were divided in 2 groups. Group I had 77 patients treated with primary surgery while Group II had 65 patients treated by salvage surgery. Survival analysis was carried out by Kaplan–Meier method and difference between survival was calculated by log rank test. Multivariate analysis was carried out by Cox regression model.

Results

The overall disease free survival was 54.3% at 5 years. The survival in males was better than females. However, there was no difference in survival by extent and grade of tumor, margins or type of surgical excision. Presence of lymph nodes, nodal stage of the disease, and perineural invasion was found to significantly reduce survival, while patients with lymphoplasmocytic infiltration had significantly better survival. Gender was the only predictor of survival on multivariate analysis.

Conclusions

The results of present study show that there is no difference in survival between patients undergoing primary or salvage surgery. However, these results should be interpreted with caution in absence of randomized controlled trials.

Keywords: Buccal mucosa, Carcinoma, Radiation, Survival, Prognosis

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0748-7983(08)00078-4

doi:10.1016/j.ejso.2008.02.008

European Journal of Surgical Oncology
Volume 35, Issue 4 , Pages 362-367, April 2009