European Journal of Surgical Oncology
Volume 34, Issue 12 , Pages 1271-1276, December 2008

Intercalary segmental reconstruction after bone tumor resection

  • B. Fuchs

      Affiliations

    • Department of Orthopedics, Balgrist University Hospital, Forchstrasse 340, 8008 Zurich, ZH, Switzerland
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +41 44 386 16 63; fax: +41 44 386 16 69.
  • ,
  • C. Ossendorf

      Affiliations

    • Department of Orthopedics, Balgrist University Hospital, Forchstrasse 340, 8008 Zurich, ZH, Switzerland
  • ,
  • T. Leerapun

      Affiliations

    • Department of Orthopedics, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
  • ,
  • F.H. Sim

      Affiliations

    • Department of Orthopedics, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN 55905, USA

Accepted 27 November 2007.

Abstract 

Background/aims

Intercalary resection can be used for primary as well as metastatic tumors. Reconstruction options include vascularized fibula graft, interposition of an allograft, combination of vascularized fibula and allograft, segmental prosthesis, insertion of an extracorporally irradiated autograft, segmental transportation, either with external fixation or by using an intramedullary rod, intercalary scaffolds augmented with growth factors, and technical refinements for the resection of tumors located close to the growth plate. The purpose of this review is to discuss the indications, limitations and pitfalls of each of these techniques.

Methods

The PubMed database was searched for articles on intercalary reconstruction after bone tumor resection and for the different reconstruction options presented in this review. Additionally, cross-referencing was used to cover articles eventually undetected by the respective search strategies. The resulting articles were then reviewed with regard to the different techniques, outcomes and complications of the reconstruction options.

Results

With the advance of imaging techniques and the use of chemotherapy for malignant bone tumors, surgical techniques can be refined. There are many techniques for the reconstruction of large intercalary defects of long bones, with which the orthopedic oncologist needs to be familiar. General oncologic principles of achieving a wide margin still need to be respected.

Conclusion

The techniques presented in this review will allow a better functional outcome of patients. It will continue to be important to carefully analyze each patient's situation and to adapt and individualize the method of reconstruction used.

Keywords: Tumor resection, Bone defect, Intercalary, Segmental, Vascularized fibula, Allograft, Tumor prosthesis, Extracorporal irradiation, Segmental transport

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0748-7983(07)00630-0

doi:10.1016/j.ejso.2007.11.010

European Journal of Surgical Oncology
Volume 34, Issue 12 , Pages 1271-1276, December 2008