European Journal of Surgical Oncology
Volume 34, Issue 2 , Pages 135-142 , February 2008

The value of MRI compared to mammography in the assessment of tumour extent in invasive lobular carcinoma of the breast

  • R.M. Mann

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiology, University Medical Center Nijmegen, The Netherlands
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +31 24 3618766.
  • ,
  • J. Veltman

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiology, University Medical Center Nijmegen, The Netherlands
  • ,
  • J.O. Barentsz

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiology, University Medical Center Nijmegen, The Netherlands
  • ,
  • T. Wobbes

      Affiliations

    • Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Nijmegen, The Netherlands
  • ,
  • J.G. Blickman

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiology, University Medical Center Nijmegen, The Netherlands
  • ,
  • C. Boetes

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiology, University Medical Center Nijmegen, The Netherlands

,Accepted 28 April 2007.

References 

  1. Winchester DP, Cox JD. Standards for diagnosis and management of invasive breast carcinoma. American College of Radiology. American College of Surgeons. College of American Pathologists. Society of Surgical Oncology. CA Cancer J Clin. 1998;48(2):83–107
  2. Charfare H, Limongelli S, Purushotham AD. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer. Br J Surg. 2005;92(1):14–23
  3. Kuerer HM, Singletary SE. Integration of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and surgery in the treatment of patients with breast carcinoma. Breast Dis. 2001;12:69–81
  4. Partridge SC, Gibbs JE, Lu Y, et al. MRI measurements of breast tumor volume predict response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy and recurrence-free survival. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2005;184(6):1774–1781
  5. Fornage BD, Sneige N, Ross MI, et al. Small (< or =2cm) breast cancer treated with us-guided radiofrequency ablation: feasibility study. Radiology. 2004;231(1):215–224
  6. Whitworth PW, Rewcastle JC. Cryoablation and cryolocalization in the management of breast disease. J Surg Oncol. 2005;90(1):1–9
  7. Wu F, Wang ZB, Zhu H, et al. Extracorporeal high intensity focused ultrasound treatment for patients with breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2005;92(1):51–60
  8. Newstead GM, Baute PB, Toth HK. Invasive lobular and ductal carcinoma: mammographic findings and stage at diagnosis. Radiology. 1992;184(3):623–627
  9. Yeatman TJ, Cantor AB, Smith TJ, et al. Tumor biology of infiltrating lobular carcinoma. Implications for management. Ann Surg. 1995;222(4):549–559
  10. Watermann DO, Tempfer C, Hefler LA, Parat C, Stickeler E. Ultrasound morphology of invasive lobular breast cancer is different compared with other types of breast cancer. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2005;31(2):167–174
  11. Boetes C, Veltman J, van Die L, Bult P, Wobbes T, Barentsz JO. The role of MRI in invasive lobular carcinoma. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2004;86(1):31–37
  12. Kepple J, Layeeque R, Klimberg VS, et al. Correlation of magnetic resonance imaging and pathologic size of infiltrating lobular carcinoma of the breast. Am J Surg. 2005;190(4):623–627
  13. Munot K, Dall B, Achuthan R, Parkin G, Lane S, Horgan K. Role of magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis and single-stage surgical resection of invasive lobular carcinoma of the breast. Br J Surg. 2002;89(10):1296–1301
  14. Morrow M. Magnetic resonance imaging in breast cancer: one step forward, two steps back?. JAMA. 2004;292(22):2779–2780
  15. Flanagan FL, McDermott MB, Barton PT, et al. Invasive breast cancer: mammographic measurement. Radiology. 1996;199(3):819–823
  16. American College of Radiology . BI-RADS(r) – MRI. BI-RADS (r) Atlas. Reston: American College of Radiology; 2003;
  17. Wurdinger S, Kamprath S, Eschrich D, Schneider A, Kaiser WA. False-negative findings of malignant breast lesions on preoperative magnetic resonance mammography. Breast. 2001;10(2):131–139
  18. Lee AH, Dublin EA, Bobrow LG, Poulsom R. Invasive lobular and invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast show distinct patterns of vascular endothelial growth factor expression and angiogenesis. J Pathol. 1998;185(4):394–401
  19. Dillon MF, Hill AD, Fleming FJ, et al. Identifying patients at risk of compromised margins following breast conservation for lobular carcinoma. Am J Surg. 2006;191(2):201–205
  20. Chagpar AB, Martin RC, Hagendoorn LJ, Chao C, McMasters KM. Lumpectomy margins are affected by tumor size and histologic subtype but not by biopsy technique. Am J Surg. 2004;188(4):399–402
  21. Weinstein SP, Orel SG, Heller R, et al. MR Imaging of the breast in patients with invasive lobular carcinoma. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2001;176(2):399–406
  22. Schelfout K, Van GM, Kersschot E, Verslegers I, et al. Preoperative breast MRI in patients with invasive lobular breast cancer. Eur Radiol. 2004;14(7):1209–1216
  23. Heusinger K, Lohberg C, Lux MP, et al. Assessment of breast cancer tumor size depends on method, histopathology and tumor size itself. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2005;94(1):17–23
  24. Dummin LJ, Cox M, Plant L. Prediction of breast tumor size by mammography and sonography-a breast screen experience. Breast. 2007;16(1):38–46
  25. Cherel P, Becette V, Hagay C. Stellate images: anatomic and radiologic correlations. Eur J Radiol. 2005;54(1):37–54
  26. Francis A, England DW, Rowlands DC, Wadley M, Walker C, Bradley SA. The diagnosis of invasive lobular breast carcinoma. does MRI have a role?. Breast. 2001;10(1):38–40
  27. Kneeshaw PJ, Turnbull LW, Smith A, Drew PJ. Dynamic contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging aids the surgical management of invasive lobular breast cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2003;29(1):32–37
  28. Van Goethem M, Schelfout K, Kersschot E, et al. Enhancing area surrounding breast carcinoma on MR mammography: comparison with pathological examination. Eur Radiol. 2004;14(8):1363–1370
  29. Berg WA, Gutierrez L, NessAiver MS, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of mammography, clinical examination, US, and MR imaging in preoperative assessment of breast cancer. Radiology. 2004;233(3):830–849
  30. Morrow M, Keeney K, Scholtens D, Wei J, Steel J, Khan SA. Selecting patients for breast-conserving therapy: the importance of lobular histology. Cancer. 2006;
  31. Liberman L, Morris EA, Dershaw DD, Abramson AF, Tan LK. Ductal enhancement on MR imaging of the breast. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2003;181(2):519–525
  32. Li CI, Malone KE, Saltzman BS, Daling JR. Risk of invasive breast carcinoma among women diagnosed with ductal carcinoma in situ and lobular carcinoma in situ, 1988-2001. Cancer. 2006;106(10):2104–2112

PII: S0748-7983(07)00205-3

doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2007.04.020

European Journal of Surgical Oncology
Volume 34, Issue 2 , Pages 135-142 , February 2008